[jmlamerson]

chief31;157214 wrote:

Awww. Well, maybe someone else will help you to list all, or even just some of, the members who have been at the business end of my banning-stick.

Ask DH! He has had plenty of time to amass such a list, since he made that claim. Surely he won’t mind sharing a few names with ya.

I have never really banned anyone. I didn’t even get to do the origional Timsatt ban. (Darn!)

Look, the rules are so simple. You broke the rule, when you called another member an “idiot”.

You got an infraction.

Please, just get over it already, and move on. No need for you to spend your whole evening in a rage, hoping that you will get me to do the same thing.

It won’t happen. I know how to edit before I post.

As I always say…

Editing: So easy, a caveman can do it.

Geez. If “idiot” is worth an infraction, then your insults should be worth a banning.

Let’s face it, you infracted me because your mad over the fact that you lose every argument to me. Calling a poster an idiot in passing has not been something which people have been infracted for at any point on this board.

You are petty and weak, trying to revenge your loss at various arguments. You are a lousy mod, and this board would be better off without you.

[jmlamerson]

Chiefster;157211 wrote:

Chief31 is a mod because he more than amply demonstrated the ability to be more then reasonably level headed with the utmost respect for the site and it’s rules. He has yet, to my recollection, abused or otherwise misused his authority as a mod here; in fact he has gone out of his way to be careful to take every conceivable avenue to avoid banning members.

And yet, Chiefster, here we are. His insulting me, trying his damndest to provoke a response.

I would not even attempt to tell you your business, but perhaps Chiefs31 modship may be one of those things you may want to review.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157207 wrote:

Well….

Maybe you can just name a couple of those whom I have banned?

Not all of them of course. Just a few. Maybe three? Two? One?

List ’em up.

Or is all of this just QQing over the infraction you recieved for directly calling another member an ‘idiot’?

Not like you didn’t know that you were going to get an infraction, when you did it.

You have enough of them, each with a description of why, to have figured out how you keep getting them.

As for reporting me….

I know, respect, and obey the rules here. (Psst. I even try to help enforce them.)

One could note the number of infractions that I have been given in my time here, as well as the amount of time that I have been here.

Quite a few posts, with no infractions.

What does your profile look like?

Ewwww. Kinda gives the impression that you have no respect for the site.

But let’s just see if snivelling helps your case any. Shall we?

Agsin, I would love nothing more than to respond to your baseless insults. But I know you are looking to ban anyone who dares disagree with you. You track record speaks for itself.

Your lack of infractions may be tied your your status as a mod. You appointment to which I would welcome an explanation.

All in all, I will continue to address you in neutral terms. I will not respond to your insults, simply because you do not have the courage to be addressed how you address others.

[jmlamerson]

Chiefster;157206 wrote:

It’s all a conspiracy I tell ya! It’s all do the one armed man behind a grassy knoll! 😆

Herm lost an arm somewhere? I say, good.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157202 wrote:

Seems you are lost.

Let me guide you some…

If I wanted to pretend (for what reason, I have no idea) that that came from this thread, then I would simply move that post to this thread, then quote it.

But, as any fool can plainly see, the quote is a reply to the reactions to his “Trade Bowe” thread.

Also, I might have considered removing the blue arrow that leads directly to the thread where he post is located.

And, if I was attempting to “pretend” that it was from this thread, I might have considered not giving you a direct answer when you asked where it came from.

But then I have to think that even you could have figured that out, without having anyone hold your hand through it.

Maybe I should have just given you another couple of days to contemplate the complexities of it all.

😆

I’d respond, but you have a habit of banning folks who respond to your insults.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157195 wrote:

…. :sign0153:

I can’t write it simpler.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157193 wrote:

Click the little blue arrow in the quote. It will lead the way.

Gee you’re posting from another thread and pretending it’s this one. No surprise.

The OP is not a Chiefs fan. You’re defense of him is approaching laughable.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157191 wrote:

Good thing the site’s management doesn’t make those kind of assumpions at what one “might” actually mean.

I mean, can you even imagine how many infractions you would have piled up by now?

😆

Where are you getting that quote from? Because it’s nowhere on this thread.

[jmlamerson]

Coach;157183 wrote:

Chief31 didn’t say that and you know it. Just because he understands someone else’s frustration, doesn’t mean he shares the same viewpoints.
:pokey:

The OP is not a Chiefs fan. You know this and I know this.

If a poster states that he believes the Chiefs are such a bad franchise that top players should be traded to avoid the indignity of being on the Chiefs, they are not a Chiefs fan.

I know Chiefs31 didn’t say he agreed. He merely “understood.” Which means what, exactly?

Chiefs31 wants to be a fan without going through the bad times. He wants to join the Chiefs bandwagon when things get good. How do I know this? He’s pretending the OP is a legitimate fan.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157184 wrote:

I don’t think that that is his actual belief, but a show of frustration.

Mere overreaction.

Much like your reactions to this thread.

I don’t think that’s his actual belief either. I think he’s trolling by stating obviously inflammatory and increasingly negative posts. I think that anyone who is ignoring this is doing so either out of his own desire to inflame or a catastrophic blindness.

[jmlamerson]

Canada;157179 wrote:

Whats an OP?

Original Poster

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157175 wrote:

😆

I don’t agree with him. I just happen to understand how someone could become frustrated enough to say things like he has.

If you understand the OP’s belief that we should trade Bowe so he’s off such a terrible franchise (which he actually posted in another thread he opened), then you are no longer a Chiefs fan.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157158 wrote:

He just sounds like alot Cubs fans I’ve know over many years.

When the team is losing and doesn’t seem to be getting better, alot of people get irrational. Check out some of the Official game threads.

This guy obviously isn’t a Chiefs fan. Yashi did a better job than I could listing his threads. This guy is a troll. No more no less. The fact that you agree with him says more about you than it does that validity of his opinions.

[jmlamerson]

chief31;157153 wrote:

😆

I’m just saying that the optimistic fans always seem to feel like they are being ‘attacked’ around here. But when a truly pessimistic fan shows up, just look at the reaction.

His posts get reported, though there is absolutely no rule violation.

And there is an outcry to get him banned from the site.

This is a team that has lost 28 of their last 34 regular season games. Including two consecutive home games against The lowly, and hated, Raiders.

Alot of people will fly off the handle. But somehow, this guy needs to banned for it? And two members went ahead and disrespected the site to directly insult him?

You’re either blind or are A.R. TTS posting under a psuedonym.

[jmlamerson]

yashi;157046 wrote:

How about the fact that he has 27 posts and none of them have contributed anything useful to the forum? In fact nothing he says makes any sense whatsoever. On top of that, he’s obviously not a Chief’s fan. He has super negative rep too, and I haven’t even had any part of that.

“lucky lefty you better just start putting our losses in your sig,were never hanna win a game….we won’t be the first to go 0-16 atleast”

“ok so we saved part of Tonys ceerer so let’s not suficate all of his.Poor Bowe sits there not being thrown to.Save his ceerer”

“yag I just figured out we suck”

“it’s over we just lost 2 games to start the season off.”

“Well it’s pretty obvious why I’m seeing a lot on this….Chargers win the Division at 8-8 maybe 9 wins,Broncos win 6,And us…well 3-5,And the Raiders will pull of 3-5 too.So really whoever losses tomarrow will finish in the Wine cellar.“

Also, his spelling offends me. But whatever, go ahead and keep giving me warnings and infractions while non-fans like this are ruining the forums one incoherent post at a time.

You’ll never see me attack anyone who actually contributes here, for what it’s worth.

Yeah, the guy is obviously an idiot trolling Chiefs fans for a reaction.

[Author]

Posts