Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
chief31;238374 wrote:Awwww. Really?
You can’t just get over it?
I don’t like internet trolls. I think you are a very sad, very pathetic guy who thinks he’s smart and tries to get over the disappointments in his real life by arguing on the internet. Am I wrong?
chief31;238372 wrote:Now, now.You know you broke the rules, and I have skipped my MOD duties, to allow you to get over it, and move on.
But, I don’t think you convinced anybody that Tom Brady was a blue chip prospect. And you certainly continue to respond to me, despite claiming that you don’t.
Are you certain I lost an argument? Because it doesn’t feel much like it.
What rules did I break exactly? You hide behing your mod power to insult other posters and hide the fact you lose arguments. You’ll probably lock the thread soon as soon as you can be sure you’ll get the last word. Again, pathetic.
chief31;238370 wrote:I have seen the worst of JML. (So far)But I still think he loves me. 😆
It’s all fun. Some of the remarks sting sometimes. But it is easy enough to get over without taking it hard.
I have been into it with most of the people here, at one point, or another.
Some hold grudges, while some deal with it more lightly.
And JML is one of my favorite posters here. I agree with him on almost every major topic there is.
We end up getting into these long, drawn-out, slap-fests because disagreeing with even the smallest thing gets him fired up.
I makes mistakes all the time. It is part of life, as nobody is perfect, and I am not even close.
But, if you show me where I made an error, I am happy to admit it.
JML becomes defensive when a minor flaw in some statement is pointed out. And immediately ups the ante.
Knowing that Tom Brady was not, in any way, a Blue Chip prospect, means that he can raise the bet all day, but, eventually, that small flaw will be exposed.
Hard to pass up an all-in bet, when I know that my hand is a winner.
It’s because you’re a troll. You’d have been kicked off this board a long time ago for trolling if you weren’t friends with the guy who created it.
chief31;238363 wrote:If you can’t handle a little back and fourth, then go cry quietly somewhere.But follow the rules and avoid the temptation to let your inner child get you an infraction.
It’s just playful banter. Don’t take it so hard. It is suppoesd to be fun, and if it isn’t, then why keep doing it?
Have some self-control.
I’m not the one threatening infractions because I lost an argument. Pathetic.
azchiefsfan;238359 wrote:Watch out 31, he’ll go all hood on you any moment. You know with the asses and the capping and all. (: It’s rather like wrestling with a pig. After a while you figure out they enjoy it.It says that a man may be judged by the company he keeps . . .
chief31;238357 wrote:Awww.. You don’t want to throw another lie on the fire?NAH! You are ready to make uneducated assumptions now!
WOOT!!!
Do you have some rule against thinking before blurting out whatever comes to your mind?
However, since you seem so interested iin me personally now….
At any age, I enjoy a little internet fun. You don’t?
You put yourself through the agony of these discussions for someone else’s benefit?
What a humanitarian!!!!
Seriously…. Do you not realize how silly it is to try and make fun of someone for debating online, when you are playing the exact same game?
Depressed?
Not me.
I’m not making fun of you for debating online. I love debating online.
I’m making fun of you because you’re an internet troll. Which is below pederasts and serial killers on life’s hierarchy.
TopekaRoy;238344 wrote:Maybe I can help you guys out here. You seem to be having trouble with the term “prospect.” A blue chip prospect is a player who is expected to be one of the best and to be picked in the first round. Brady was never a blue chip prospect because he was never rated that highly when he was a prospect.Over the years he has become a blue chip player which shows that scouts were wrong about his potential and should have rated him as a blue chip prospect but they didn’t.
So quit calling him a blue chip prospect. He is not a prospect now and wasn’t “blue chip” when he was a prospect.
He is, however, absolutely a blue chip player now.
Whatever term will make everyone happy, I am happy to use. There’s an old lawyer saying, “When you have the facts, pound the facts. When you have the law you pound the law. When you have neither, you pound the table.”
Whining about the semantics of what “blue-chip” and “high-powered offense mean” is chief31 pounding the table. The only bright spot is that he’ll be calling Cassel the worst player we ever had in a couple years if he doesn’t work out.
chief31;238353 wrote:Are you sure about this?It is seeming like maybe you were full of it. But we all know that that couldn’t be the case.
So why does it seem like you are responding to me?
It’s like a Ben Stiller movie, where he just keeps telling more and more lies to try and cover an initial, extremely innocent, fib, or mistake.
First you tried to claim Tom Brady as a blue chip prospect, because he disproves your exaggerative claims of not being able to win a Super Bowl without one.
Then, because he was drafted in the late sixth round, thus disproving any claim that he was a blue chip, you try to bend the term’s meaning by suggesting that a blue chip prospect can be rated low, knowing that “blue chip” is a high rating, not a low one?
Then, to take it even further, you again try to change the meaning of the term to suggest that a long-time NFL starter can somehow become a blue chip prospect?
And next you will be telling us how you grew up “milking” cats to feed the kittens.
😆 :yahoo:
You know, we all watch that kind of movie and think “there’s no way somebody keeps inventing new, ridiculous lies like that, it just couldn’t really happen”.
And yet…. here you are.
Uh huh. Whatever makes you feel better about yourself here.
A quick question, when you created “chief31” as your name here, was 31 your age? If so, wouldn’t you be close to about 40 now? If so, does the thought that you’re wasting your life starting semantic-driven arguments on message boards ever depressing to you?
chief31;238339 wrote:PLEASE RESPOND! I can’t handle you not responding to me!😆
So, wait a minute….
You don’t like me?
But I NEED you to like me!!!!
So, since Brady wasn’t rated as a blue chip, he was a blue chip anyway?
It is a rating.
😆 😆 😆
It *is* a rating. That can be either pre-draft or post-draft. What’s going over your head here?
And I feel the need to take your conversation here to its end. If I don’t talk to you, who will?
chief31;238337 wrote:It seems unstoppable, your ability to not respond to me!😆
So, blue chip has nothing to do with a player’s rating?
Sure, a player is ranked “can’t-miss. ” In Brady’s case they were wrong. What’s going over you head here?
And you’re still responding to my initial post. Flattering, but get a life.
chief31;238334 wrote:You just can’t stop not responding to me.😆I understand.
A blue chip prospect is a player rated as the best in the nation…..
And then not drafted until the end of the sixth round!
😆
I was either mistaken, or…..
I lied.
Either way, it won’t be the last time.
You, a liar who doesn’t know what he’s talking about? Get out.
And a blue-chip prospect is one who can’t miss. Like Brady, though no one knew it in 2001. But, hey, whatever wrong definition brings you happiness.
I’m putting the clock at two years until you pretend you never liked Cassel at all. That sound right?
chief31;238330 wrote:I hear ya man. It’s crazy how you keep not responding to me.😆
How good he was?He wasn’t.
He didn’t break past an average QB Rating until his fourth year as a starter.
He was an effective game manager. But as he grew into a gun-slinger, they quit winning Super Bowls.
He was, at best, a slightly above average QB when they were winning Super Bowls.
Myself, I prefer the three-time Super Bowl champ to the “blue chip” gun-slinger.
Again, I’m flattered that you keep responding to my old posts. Especially because you were out of here before I threw a tantrum. Am I the only one who will respond to you or something? I promise you, it’s just out of fact checking, not as a sign that you have anytrhing to say.
And your inability to understand the term “blue-chip prospect” is passing sad and entering ridiculous.
chief31;238322 wrote:Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight………………..But yeah…
Tom Brady: 10-6 after Matt Cassel took the same team to 11-5.
Not bad for a late sixth round blue chip prospect though.
😆While your responding to my old posts is in a way flattering, you really have to get over your need for my company.
Yes, Brady did poorly after coming back from season-ending surgey. You think this helps your point somehow? And Tom Brady would have gone 1st overall if people had realized how good he was. He was a blue chip prospect (seriously, do yourself a favor and look the word up) that no one realized was that great.
chief31;238310 wrote:😆I’ll leave you alone so as to avoid another temper tantrum.
Bye. I’ll miss your tremendous cowardice. I’ll revisit in a couple years when you say that Cassel was never good and you never supported him.
chief31;238306 wrote:Context?No Sir!
You are a man of pure factual wording, are you not?
You lost your marbles last time I took your words for their obvious context.
Still…… No surprise that you chose to double-down on that nonsense.
Oh no! A challenge to my “guts”?
What ever shall I do?
There was no argument here. You just refuse to see your exaggerations for anything less than fact.
I think you are a very smart guy, who is too prideful to acknowledge your own mistakes.
I mean, you went so far as to call Tom Brady (A late sixth round pick) a blue chip prospect, just to try and save yourself from having to admit to the slightest error.
Can you believe that?!?!?!
I know you would enjoy a laugh at anybody else trying to label a late sixth round pick as a blue chip prospect.:lol:
But, just out of shere morbid pleasure…..
What record did Tom Brady get that “greatest passing offense of all time” to the year after Cassel managed 11-5?
I bet it was a whole lot better than the pedestrian Cassel did, wasn’t it?
Don’t you dare say it was 10-6 though. 😆
And, any prediction I would have for Cassel’s future would be less of a statement about Matt Cassel, than about the team/staff around him.
You keep responding to me buddy, not me to you. You obviously care more about my opinion than I’ll ever care about yours.
And you have no guts. That’s good to know.
