Forum Replies Created
-
#58ChiefsFan;209184 wrote:honda522;168953 wrote:I still feel he should be given a full 2 years, we go changing coaches every year, it can be hard on a team. I think Pioli should lock down on his power, force him into a relationship with an OC and fire this terrible DC we have who never should of been fired.
You are joking right?
That was a quote from last season.
The DC Honda wanted fired was no Romeo Crennel.
Sn@keIze;168948 wrote:I usually wait a couple day or so b4 i post. butI want Todd Haley’s head on a stick.
Forgive me if i seem a bit harsh. But i need some arse.
I cant wait till that MF dies. Then im going to the funeral eating some popcorn.
But then i will consolingly go to his parents…and say “i am sorry for ur loss”…
And then kick that b!tch in the ovary so hard and kick his nuts so hard that they can never fowl the earth by producing another stupid sh!t like that again.
And I’d better hear a “im sorry for ur loss from them”………
😆
Probably best if you do wait a couple days. But exremely enertaining.
NFL Immortals;160781 wrote:Today’s game was great. Thankfully, Dallas was able to pull it out. I know a lot of people will continue to bash the ‘Boys, but they got it done. Who cares if it was against the Chiefs.You guys shouldn’t hang you heads too low. This should give you some hope that you can beat someone this season. You still have winnable games against the Raiders and Browns.
Look at the bright side, you got to see a game versus the Dallas Cowboys. How often does that happen for the Chiefs?
How ’bout them Cowboys, baby!
Yep. Them Cowboys are surely the envy of the NFL for having squeeked out an OT thriller against an 0-5 team.
Chiefster;160949 wrote:Because he hasn’t broken any rules.But it’s amazing how “classy” our own members have decided to conduct themselves here.
Looks like six infractions in this thread, and not one of them for the trolling Cowboys fan.
But rep to those who managed to reply within the rules.
jmlamerson;157217 wrote:Geez. If “idiot” is worth an infraction, then your insults should be worth a banning.Let’s face it, you infracted me because your mad over the fact that you lose every argument to me. Calling a poster an idiot in passing has not been something which people have been infracted for at any point on this board.
You are petty and weak, trying to revenge your loss at various arguments. You are a lousy mod, and this board would be better off without you.
That Kurt Warner thing still bugging you? Just get over it. So you were wrong? Who cares? You should be used to it. It happens in almost all of your posts. No biggie.
You, as much anybody, should know that you don’t get infractions for back-handed comments.
Back-handed comments are discouraged, as they do have a tendancy to start trouble. But, since you were throwing them around, I just figured you wanted to play.
Guess not.
But, I see you are gonna go with the “HE”S OUT TO GET ME!!!!” defense, for this infraction.
Uhhh… Good luck with that.
Now, seriously… I think you are a pretty football-smart person. But that you hide it with your ego, and all the cheap, unnecessary back-handed insults.
However, no matter who you are, when you resort to name-calling, you have deliberately insulted the site, by refusing to adhere to some simple rules, that you have been repeatedly informed of.
doobs_05;157219 wrote:I would say something about TS(thread starter) or OP topics but i do not know if hes just an angry fan or just trying to troll in the forumsExactly. He could be a very disapointed Chiefs fan, or possibly a troll.
Seein’ as how he came back to the “Trade Bowe” thread and said that he wasn’t serious, I lean toward the ‘disapoited’ thing, myself.
jmlamerson;157209 wrote:Agsin, I would love nothing more than to respond to your baseless insults. But I know you are looking to ban anyone who dares disagree with you. You track record speaks for itself.Your lack of infractions may be tied your your status as a mod. You appointment to which I would welcome an explanation.
All in all, I will continue to address you in neutral terms. I will not respond to your insults, simply because you do not have the courage to be addressed how you address others.
Awww. Well, maybe someone else will help you to list all, or even just some of, the members who have been at the business end of my banning-stick.
Ask DH! He has had plenty of time to amass such a list, since he made that claim. Surely he won’t mind sharing a few names with ya.
I have never really banned anyone. I didn’t even get to do the origional Timsatt ban. (Darn!)
Look, the rules are so simple. You broke the rule, when you called another member an “idiot”.
You got an infraction.
Please, just get over it already, and move on. No need for you to spend your whole evening in a rage, hoping that you will get me to do the same thing.
It won’t happen. I know how to edit before I post.
As I always say…
Editing: So easy, a caveman can do it.
jmlamerson;157204 wrote:I’d respond, but you have a habit of banning folks who respond to your insults.jmlamerson;157204 wrote:I’d respond, but you have a habit of banning folks who respond to your insults.Well….
Maybe you can just name a couple of those whom I have banned?
Not all of them of course. Just a few. Maybe three? Two? One?
List ’em up.
Or is all of this just QQing over the infraction you recieved for directly calling another member an ‘idiot’?
Not like you didn’t know that you were going to get an infraction, when you did it.
You have enough of them, each with a description of why, to have figured out how you keep getting them.
As for reporting me….
I know, respect, and obey the rules here. (Psst. I even try to help enforce them.)
One could note the number of infractions that I have been given in my time here, as well as the amount of time that I have been here.
Quite a few posts, with no infractions.
What does your profile look like?
Ewwww. Kinda gives the impression that you have no respect for the site.
But let’s just see if snivelling helps your case any. Shall we?
