Home › Forums › Kansas City Chiefs › The Locker Room › Windows 7
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
05/08/2009 at 2:42 pm #883564
Vanilla Garilla
Member::Chiefster;134614 wrote:I got the printer issue resolved; I didn’t do a clean install it allowed me to do an upgrade so I didn’t have to re-install any of my software/drivers, but for some reason the printer driver got corrupted so I just uninstalled the software and reinstalled it and it works great now. As far as the user friendliness goes: its awesome, but to tell the truth it, to me, is only marginally better then Vista with SP1. However, like I said it’s awesome I really like do like it, but not so much that I couldn’t live without it. JMHO.Lucky you getting to do an upgrade, I had to do a clean install each time (2x) and it is a pain transferring everything. My drivers were easy with windows 7 though, because it just searched and updated them automatically. IMO Windows 7 is what Vista was supposed to be, or what it was envisioned to be, just was not reached. I think they did it right this time, and customers should be happy. Oh and I wasn’t sold on it from the gate either, took me a little bit, and what sold me was when my laptop was in for prepare, and I had to go back to Vista.:bananen_smilies046:
05/08/2009 at 3:10 pm #883567Chiefster
Participant::Vanilla Garilla;134681 wrote:Lucky you getting to do an upgrade, I had to do a clean install each time (2x) and it is a pain transferring everything. My drivers were easy with windows 7 though, because it just searched and updated them automatically. IMO Windows 7 is what Vista was supposed to be, or what it was envisioned to be, just was not reached. I think they did it right this time, and customers should be happy. Oh and I wasn’t sold on it from the gate either, took me a little bit, and what sold me was when my laptop was in for prepare, and I had to go back to Vista.:bananen_smilies046:Yeah, I was real surprised that I was able to do the upgrade, it made it a lot easier. I agree with your assessment though, it is what Vista should have been.
05/09/2009 at 5:12 am #883658hermhater
Member05/09/2009 at 5:16 am #883659Chiefster
Participant::Vanilla Garilla;134386 wrote:Thanks for the rep fellows, I will share the love:bananen_smilies046:I am indeed using the 64 bit version because it is as fast as Otis Nixon….I don’t use the 64 bit internet explorer though because almost no websites function well with it.
I wish I had the PC inerds to run 64 bits!
05/09/2009 at 5:18 am #883660Chiefster
Participant05/09/2009 at 5:39 am #883663Vanilla Garilla
Member05/09/2009 at 6:14 am #883666Chiefster
Participant05/11/2009 at 8:42 pm #883856Chiefster
Participant::Quote:The first documented bug in the Windows 7 Release Candidate (build 7100) is a doozy.
Yesterday, Microsoft published Knowledge Base article 970789, which provides details of a problem that affects the 32-bit (x86) English-language version of Windows 7 build 7100. The problem, in short, is that the installer incorrectly sets access control lists (ACLs) on the root of the system drive. The longer version is described as follows:…05/11/2009 at 9:31 pm #883860Vanilla Garilla
Member::Chiefster;135010 wrote:Yeah I read this somewhere, mine didn’t update so 64 bit systems must not have been affected. Did it affect yours Chiefster?
05/12/2009 at 2:51 am #883873Chiefster
Participant05/12/2009 at 3:43 am #883876Guru
Member::Well, I have ended up with one minor problem with Windows 7. Kodak printers won’t work worth a darn for it. Kodak said they won’t release a new driver set until Win7 goes live so Kodak customers are screwed. Not Microsofts fault though. Kodak is the same company that refuses to make drivers for Linux as well.
05/12/2009 at 4:12 am #883880Chiefster
Participant::Guru;135032 wrote:Well, I have ended up with one minor problem with Windows 7. Kodak printers won’t work worth a darn for it. Kodak said they won’t release a new driver set until Win7 goes live so Kodak customers are screwed. Not Microsofts fault though. Kodak is the same company that refuses to make drivers for Linux as well.Man, that sucks!
I think it’s stupid not to go ahead and release a driver for this OS.
05/12/2009 at 4:48 am #883882Vanilla Garilla
Member::Guru;135032 wrote:Well, I have ended up with one minor problem with Windows 7. Kodak printers won’t work worth a darn for it. Kodak said they won’t release a new driver set until Win7 goes live so Kodak customers are screwed. Not Microsofts fault though. Kodak is the same company that refuses to make drivers for Linux as well.Yeah that’s crap. They know Win7 is coming, so why not release some drivers, and all in all it should be an easy fix. Another reason why I will always choose HP for printers.
05/12/2009 at 5:06 am #883883Guru
Member::Vanilla Garilla;135038 wrote:Yeah that’s crap. They know Win7 is coming, so why not release some drivers, and all in all it should be an easy fix. Another reason why I will always choose HP for printers.The only reason I even purchased it was for the affordable Wifi functionality. The ink is cheaply priced but also doesn’t last near as long as what the overpriced HP cartridges do. Probably a wash on ink I guess. Hp didn’t have any reasonably priced Wifi printers at the time though. Too late to change it now I guess.
05/12/2009 at 2:16 pm #874763Vanilla Garilla
Member::Guru;135039 wrote:The only reason I even purchased it was for the affordable Wifi functionality. The ink is cheaply priced but also doesn’t last near as long as what the overpriced HP cartridges do. Probably a wash on ink I guess. Hp didn’t have any reasonably priced Wifi printers at the time though. Too late to change it now I guess.I know that’s right, I looked everywhere for a decent priced one and couldn’t find one anywhere. I ended up getting the standard non wifi one and just taking my laptop over there each time I wanted to use it.
Just curious how much ink is for the Kodak, I have been getting two multicolor packs for 24.99, and too me thats reasonable. I get two blacks for 19.99, which isnt bad either. I dont print a whole hell of a lot, so i only need ink 3-4 times a year.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.