Which thread will timssat1 screw up next????

Home Forums Kansas City Chiefs The Locker Room Which thread will timssat1 screw up next????

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 97 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #808914
    hermhater
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    prough91;54540 wrote:
    I promised chiefster that I wouldn’t resort to namecalling and the such with him. I think if everyone ignored him he would just go away. Lord, I want to tear him up though.

    Name calling is for children.

    We are all adults here and can resort to much better tactics than that.

    I wonder what tactics are available though…

    Can we make fun of ourselves and then call ourselves timsatt?

    …a loophole perhaps from the liberal media?

    😆

    #808916
    prough91
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    hermhater;54544 wrote:
    Name calling is for children.

    We are all adults here and can resort to much better tactics than that.

    I wonder what tactics are available though…

    Can we make fun of ourselves and then call ourselves timsatt?

    …a loophole perhaps from the liberal media?

    😆

    Lol, I’m actually a conservative, but some people can really make us look stupid.

    #808917
    prough91
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    Guru;54542 wrote:
    There is an ignore feature that you can assign to anyone on the site.

    I will not rest, nay, take refuge, until I can expose tim’s ridiculous swill.

    #808918
    hermhater
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    Guru;54542 wrote:
    There is an ignore feature that you can assign to anyone on the site.

    I spoke with Coach and he said I could not be ignored.

    😆

    #808919
    prough91
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    hermhater;54548 wrote:
    I spoke with Coach and he said I could not be ignored.

    😆

    Only in our dreams.

    #808924
    Guru
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    hermhater;54544 wrote:
    Name calling is for children.

    We are all adults here and can resort to much better tactics than that.

    I wonder what tactics are available though…

    Can we make fun of ourselves and then call ourselves timsatt?

    …a loophole perhaps from the drive-by media?

    😆

    FYP.

    #808926
    hermhater
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    hermhater;54544 wrote:
    Name calling is for children.

    We are all adults here and can resort to much better tactics than that.

    I wonder what tactics are available though…

    Can we make fun of ourselves and then call ourselves timsatt?

    …a loophole perhaps from the liberal media?

    😆

    Guru;54554 wrote:
    FYP.

    Thank you!

    😆

    #808957
    chief31
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    Coach;54335 wrote:
    You say this like it was forever ago. I guess in Tims case it was before he was born.

    It truly has become an election where we are required to choose the lesser of evils. And pretty much nothing will get done except for a lot of spending of tax dollars. I’m trying to think of any major change that any recent president(last 5) has made that I have benefited from. I can’t think of one.

    I couldn’t agree more with this post.

    Ron Paul. :D

    timsatt1;54338 wrote:
    yes, this is the whole point. you liberals are expecting something from the government. that is the problem.

    i expect NOTHING from the government. they do not owe me anything, i have no sort of entitlement.

    it is not what your country can do for you, it is what you can do for your country. that is a line you liberals will NEVER understand.

    Some people expect something from the government based upon the fact that they have been paying for it for their entire careers.

    DrunkHillbilly;54388 wrote:
    I don’t really mind my phone being tapped if it’s going to protect. I don’t have anything to hide.

    I have something to hide. My private conversations. You know, as well as I do, that this is just another way for the government to have “control” over the people. But when the republicans do it, you think that is O.K.

    timsatt1;54403 wrote:
    oh hell yeah i am serious. you think republicans are the ones banning smoking in privately owned businesses? HELL NO. it is democrats. it is california. and california is pushing towards banning smoking PERIOD. not even in your own house.

    but government should not have that kind of power to tell a privately owned restaurant that they cannot allow smoking. That is what PRIVATE is all about, the company private and free. CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL.

    Yes. I think that Republicans are doing that stuff too. Because I know the names of Giulianni and Schwartzeneger. You seem to push all blame on the left, and ignore the actions of the right.

    I think that we all agree to the “lesser of two evils” theory, but differ on which is actually the lesser.

    One party wants to regulate everything here, moreso than the other, and the other wants to regulate the rest of the world, moreso than the other. Both parties want to use our money to fund their ambitions.

    Me, I would rather that money be used to help Americans, than to stick our nose in the rest of the worlds problems, by causing bigger problems, then trying to clean-up those messes.

    Although, I hate the loss of freedom as much as the use of military might, to impose our will upon the rest of the world.

    Both parties suck. I will vote for Ron Paul. (Listed as a Rep. but certainly not in the recently most common mold.)

    No more politics for me.

    #808958
    hermhater
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    chief31;54588 wrote:
    Ron Paul. :D

    Some people expect something from the government based upon the fact that they have been paying for it for their entire careers.

    I have something to hide. My private conversations. You know, as well as I do, that this is just another way for the government to have “control” over the people. But when the republicans do it, you think that is O.K.

    Yes. I think that Republicans are doing that stuff too. Because I know the names of Giulianni and Schwartzeneger. You seem to push all blame on the left, and ignore the actions of the right.

    I think that we all agree to the “lesser of two evils” theory, but differ on which is actually the lesser.

    One party wants to regulate everything here, moreso than the other, and the other wants to regulate the rest of the world, moreso than the other. Both parties want to use our money to fund their ambitions.

    Me, I would rather that money be used to help Americans, than to stick our nose in the rest of the worlds problems, by causing bigger problems, then trying to clean-up those messes.

    Although, I hate the loss of freedom as much as the use of military might, to impose our will upon the rest of the world.

    Both parties suck. I will vote for Ron Paul. (Listed as a Rep. but certainly not in the recently most common mold.)

    No more politics for me.

    Don’t know who not to vote for yet this time.

    Gonna be a close race again…

    Sigh…

    #808959
    rbedgood
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    prough91;54546 wrote:
    Lol, I’m actually a conservative, but some people can really make us look stupid.

    Prough…well said. Not all “conservatives” fit into TimSat’s Mold, nor do all “liberals”.

    #808986
    timsatt1
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    prough91;54540 wrote:
    I promised chiefster that I wouldn’t resort to namecalling and the such with him. I think if everyone ignored him he would just go away. Lord, I want to tear him up though.

    well you could skip the name calling and maybe try debating a specific issue??? i dont resort to name calling, but i can understand if you get in a debate that is unwinnable for you, why you would have to resort to that.

    so just curious, why should someone that works at mcdonalds make more money than they already do? it is a job that doesnt require a ton of skill…but for some reason, everyone is entitled to at least some certain amount of money no matter what job it is…sweeping the floor or whatever. interesting. but then what happens to the person who has a much harder job but is only making 3 dollars above min wage. Well, now their $10/hour is no longer $10/hr and they are getting the raw end of the deal because someone in the government thought that mcdonalds employees were not making enough.

    free market is the best market. not some sort of socialist, we work, government distributes OUR money, system.

    #809007
    prough91
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    timsatt1;54620 wrote:
    well you could skip the name calling and maybe try debating a specific issue??? i dont resort to name calling, but i can understand if you get in a debate that is unwinnable for you, why you would have to resort to that.

    so just curious, why should someone that works at mcdonalds make more money than they already do? it is a job that doesnt require a ton of skill…but for some reason, everyone is entitled to at least some certain amount of money no matter what job it is…sweeping the floor or whatever. interesting. but then what happens to the person who has a much harder job but is only making 3 dollars above min wage. Well, now their $10/hour is no longer $10/hr and they are getting the raw end of the deal because someone in the government thought that mcdonalds employees were not making enough.

    free market is the best market. not some sort of socialist, we work, government distributes OUR money, system.

    It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in an argument. -William G. McAdoo

    #809120
    timsatt1
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    prough91;54643 wrote:
    It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in an argument. -William G. McAdoo

    wow, that is deep. you won that debate with william G McAdoo’s quote.

    I agree with the quote, just don’t agree with the ignorant party.

    you libs look down on people whos parents worked hard to give them a better chance at life.

    So I should feel guilty that my dad worked his arze off and gave me more security than the ordinary person and then taught me the same discipline that he had so I can continue to provide for myself while your dad was out every night smoking doobies and having sex with every girl he could get on and paying child support out his arze.. HAHAHAHAHAH I LOVE liberals mindsets.

    so i need to “struggle” before i can have a voice!

    #809121
    timsatt1
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    i apoligize for never having premaritial sex, never doing an illegal drug in my life, not having to buy several packs of marlboro light because i have never smoked a cig in my life. For all this, i apoligize. I should have gone through the same “struggles” that many people CHOSE to go through so i could know what it is like to struggle so i can rely on other people to get me out of my mess that I personally got myself into.

    This is the mindset that our nation and economy need so we can grow and succeed to be the best we can be!! we need more victimization!!! we are all victims, save us big government, for we cannot save ourselves.

    i understand about being mad that we pay into the system such as social security (another social program the dems created) and are now realizing that a government cannot handle other people’s money and will always bankrupt itself.

    so whoever voted for the social security way back then, now we are inheriting the rewards of it…paying into it knowing we will never get anything back. I love it. We need more liberal democrats in government positions!!!

    #809124
    Chiefster
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::
    rbedgood;54590 wrote:
    Prough…well said. Not all “conservatives” fit into TimSat’s Mold, nor do all “liberals”.

    I am pretty jaded towards both sides of the isle.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 97 total)
  • The topic ‘Which thread will timssat1 screw up next????’ is closed to new replies.