Top 10 Tight Ends

This topic is empty.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 37 total)

← 1 2 3 →

Author

Posts
04/11/2009 at 4:01 am #878240
d-bowe fan
And just because you love him doesn’t mean he’s the best
I don’t know how old you are but all time doesn’t mean your lifetime you have to go further back.I thought TG should have been further up on the show but,the top 3 on the show can’t recall there names.were amazing people.it’s not all about what you put in books,it’s about how you run,catch the ball,it about hot aggresive you are.TG is thought to be #1 so much because that’s the greatest one you’ve watched
I will say TG would win best receiving TE hands down,but he may not be the best overall
04/11/2009 at 4:55 am #878257
Chief Tyler
d-bowe fan;128868 wrote:

And just because you love him doesn’t mean he’s the best
I don’t know how old you are but all time doesn’t mean your lifetime you have to go further back.I thought TG should have been further up on the show but,the top 3 on the show can’t recall there names.were amazing people.it’s not all about what you put in books,it’s about how you run,catch the ball,it about hot aggresive you are.TG is thought to be #1 so much because that’s the greatest one you’ve watched
I will say TG would win best receiving TE hands down,but he may not be the best overall

You just contradicted yourself. Catching, running, and mentality have gotten Tony to where he is. He holds every receiving record for a TE because he does his job so well. The TE position is probably one of the most changing and most versatile positions on a team. It has evolved over the years and it still varies from team to team, so I can understand somebody putting other players ahead of TG, but I can also understand somebody thinking TG is the best TE to play the game.

I’m not sure how long you’ve watched the Chiefs (or more likely some other team) but I’ve stopped taking you seriously after stupid comments on including the ones on TG and Tait, but TG is the best TE to play the game in my eyes. I’m surrounded by legions of Packer fans that admit that Sharpe wasn’t on the same level as tony. You don’t go to 9 straight probowls under a half dozen quarterbacks and multiple different coaching schemes unless you’re somebody special. TG has been one of the few constants of a fairly volatile organization over the last decades. You can’t say the same about Sharpe, Mackey and Ditka.
04/11/2009 at 5:26 am #878269
Vandelay
Tony is the the best TE of all time. I know it. You know it. The dope who made the list knows it. Nobody would give his list a second look if it made sense, so he made it controversial.
04/11/2009 at 5:28 am #878271
imported_AussieChiefsFan
d-bowe fan;128868 wrote:

And just because you love him doesn’t mean he’s the best

Sorry to disappiont you, but, HE IS the best!
04/11/2009 at 12:41 pm #878294
Ldub
It would be nice to give Tony a ring before he retires. Rings do matter. Records are cool and impressive and such, BUT the ultamite goal in the NFL is getting a superbowl ring. If you ask Tony im sure he would trade away all his records for one. Ask Dan Marino…
04/11/2009 at 1:02 pm #878297
Canada
d-bowe fan;128868 wrote:

And just because you love him doesn’t mean he’s the best
I don’t know how old you are but all time doesn’t mean your lifetime you have to go further back.I thought TG should have been further up on the show but,the top 3 on the show can’t recall there names.were amazing people.it’s not all about what you put in books,it’s about how you run,catch the ball,it about hot aggresive you are.TG is thought to be #1 so much because that’s the greatest one you’ve watched
I will say TG would win best receiving TE hands down,but he may not be the best overall

Seems that #1 is so good you can’t remember his name. (It was Kellen Winslow sr fyi)

Ldub;128929 wrote:

It would be nice to give Tony a ring before he retires. Rings do matter. Records are cool and impressive and such, BUT the ultamite goal in the NFL is getting a superbowl ring. If you ask Tony im sure he would trade away all his records for one. Ask Dan Marino…

Yeah, but how can you use # of rings to judge one player on a team of 11? (offense) By that logic you would have to say that Barry Sanders was not one of the best because he did not win any rings.
04/11/2009 at 1:30 pm #878299
Ldub
I do agree with you to a point. Barry is alot like Tony. Both have broken records, and both did it with teams that were terrible. That alone should count for somthing.
My point was more like compairing Joe Montana to Dan Marino. Joe had the rings and Dan had the records. Tony G and Shannon Sharpe will be compaired alot like that. Shannon has the rings Gonzalez has the records. My point was that rings do bare alot of weight when you compair guys in lifetime achivements.
04/11/2009 at 2:38 pm #878301
honda522
Ldub;128934 wrote:

I do agree with you to a point. Barry is alot like Tony. Both have broken records, and both did it with teams that were terrible. That alone should count for somthing.
My point was more like compairing Joe Montana to Dan Marino. Joe had the rings and Dan had the records. Tony G and Shannon Sharpe will be compaired alot like that. Shannon has the rings Gonzalez has the records. My point was that rings do bare alot of weight when you compair guys in lifetime achivements.

I don’t see how you can use rings in any point. Rings is a team effort, not an individual one.
04/11/2009 at 2:47 pm #878305
honda522
d-bowe fan;128868 wrote:

And just because you love him doesn’t mean he’s the best
I don’t know how old you are but all time doesn’t mean your lifetime you have to go further back.I thought TG should have been further up on the show but,the top 3 on the show can’t recall there names.were amazing people.it’s not all about what you put in books,it’s about how you run,catch the ball,it about hot aggresive you are.TG is thought to be #1 so much because that’s the greatest one you’ve watched
I will say TG would win best receiving TE hands down,but he may not be the best overall

If had the time, I could give you a 5 page paper convincing anyone but your self that TG is the best to ever play the game – the few stubborn and stuck up people out like you.
04/11/2009 at 2:56 pm #878307
Ldub
honda522;128936 wrote:

I don’t see how you can use rings in any point. Rings is a team effort, not an individual one.

Getting a superbowl ring is more important than records. This IS a team sport.
04/11/2009 at 2:57 pm #878308
Canada
Ldub;128934 wrote:

I do agree with you to a point. Barry is alot like Tony. Both have broken records, and both did it with teams that were terrible. That alone should count for somthing.
My point was more like compairing Joe Montana to Dan Marino. Joe had the rings and Dan had the records. Tony G and Shannon Sharpe will be compaired alot like that. Shannon has the rings Gonzalez has the records. My point was that rings do bare alot of weight when you compair guys in lifetime achivements.

To some extent yes, but when you are counting the top 10 TEs to ever play the game and Tony Gonzalez is not even in the discussion at the top 3 it is a little ridiculous. Most Receptions, most TDs most yards etc and you put Dave Fin Casper ahead of him then they obviously dont know what thy are talking about. Rings or no rings.
04/11/2009 at 3:09 pm #878310
Ldub
Canada;128943 wrote:

To some extent yes, but when you are counting the top 10 TEs to ever play the game and Tony Gonzalez is not even in the discussion at the top 3 it is a little ridiculous. Most Receptions, most TDs most yards etc and you put Dave Fin Casper ahead of him then they obviously dont know what thy are talking about. Rings or no rings.

Agreed. Ring or no ring he should be in the top 2. I think Tony is the greatest tight end of all time, im just trying to look at the situation through impartial eyes and I can see how he might not be #1. Being so far down the list is a slap in the face though.
04/12/2009 at 3:51 am #878366
honda522
Ldub;128942 wrote:

Getting a superbowl ring is more important than records. This IS a team sport.

Yes and No. It is important to win as a team, but the top tight ends ranking is suppose to be about individual players, not about the team he is on.
04/12/2009 at 5:16 am #878396
imported_AussieChiefsFan
honda522;129009 wrote:

Yes and No. It is important to win as a team, but the top tight ends ranking is suppose to be about individual players, not about the team he is on.

That’s a very disagreeable and agreeable statement.
04/12/2009 at 4:45 pm #878462
Canada
Ldub;128942 wrote:

Getting a superbowl ring is more important than records. This IS a team sport.

honda522;129009 wrote:

Yes and No. It is important to win as a team, but the top tight ends ranking is suppose to be about individual players, not about the team he is on.

Its just flat out NO. This threa is about top 10 TE not Top 10 TE and their surrounding team mates and what their teams accomlished!!
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 37 total)

← 1 2 3 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Chiefs Crowd