- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
@jason1981 341221 wrote:
No thats not it. Its reid wont adapt to his players. Its that reid wont trust in his pkayers. Reid plays not to lose. Pederson pkays to win. The play beforebthe half going for it instead of a field goal is case in point. That says everything. Reid would have never made that call in the s.b. reid gets scared and conservative. The only time not to be a conservative is in a football game. Lol
I didn’t see a whole lot different from Pederson and Reid, other than their looks, the player personnel, and The Eagles ran he ball more. Same poor time management, same dink and dunk conservative play calling until it was needed.
@Seek 341222 wrote:
I didn’t see a whole lot different from Pederson and Reid, other than their looks, the player personnel, and The Eagles ran he ball more. Same poor time management, same dink and dunk conservative play calling until it was needed.
I think eagles were more agressive but either way reid wouldnt have went for it beforebhsl. He would have taken 3 points. I always wondered if foles was better then alex smith.
Was going to make another thread like this after tonight but thought of this one. Anyone who blindly allows someone who is clearly hurting the team to stick around deserves to be shown the door.
I believe that we have more talent on the defensive side of the ball then the results are showing. No way with Ford.Houston,Jones alone we should be on the bottom of the league on D. The fact that Sutton is still around is on Reid. And just continues to show that he just doesn’t learn. He never learns. Just how I’m feeling right now
@matthewschiefs 338907 wrote:
Can we get rid of this CT guy? Nobody keeps the all-important Matthewschiefs waiting This is ban worthy :smile
What was that??? Matthewchiefs is worthy of banning??? 😆
@Chiefster 346276 wrote:
What was that??? Matthewchiefs is worthy of banning??? 😆
You wouldn’t ban me that would require doing work
But that reminds me it’s been to long HEY MODS
@matthewschiefs 346278 wrote:
You wouldn’t ban me that would require doing work
But that reminds me it’s been to long HEY MODS
Heh! Got me there. Get off my lawn! :11:
[FONT="]I saw this on another board and thought it lent an interesting perspective:
“In the postgame press conference, he says he played Ward and Smith because he wanted to get a good look at them. He says Berry hit his snap count, and they pulled him at that point, as planned.
Fuller was expected to start, but he didn’t go.
Parker was inactive.
Scandrick (as far as I can tell) never saw the field.
Erving practiced all week, but he didn’t see the field.Is it possible that Reid basically decided to take kind of a soft “rest the starters” approach to this game with the expectation that we’ll easily beat the Raiders next week?”[/FONT]
@Chiefster 346291 wrote:
[FONT=&]I saw this on another board and thought it lent an interesting perspective:
“In the postgame press conference, he says he played Ward and Smith because he wanted to get a good look at them. He says Berry hit his snap count, and they pulled him at that point, as planned.
Fuller was expected to start, but he didn’t go.
Parker was inactive.
Scandrick (as far as I can tell) never saw the field.
Erving practiced all week, but he didn’t see the field.Is it possible that Reid basically decided to take kind of a soft “rest the starters” approach to this game with the expectation that we’ll easily beat the Raiders next week?”[/FONT]
That sounds plausible. The team just was flat, as a whole, against Seattle last Sunday & it seems as though they were looking ahead to the season final and playing at home against the Raiders.
@Chiefster 346291 wrote:
I saw this on another board and thought it lent an interesting perspective:
“In the postgame press conference, he says he played Ward and Smith because he wanted to get a good look at them. He says Berry hit his snap count, and they pulled him at that point, as planned.
Fuller was expected to start, but he didn’t go.
Parker was inactive.
Scandrick (as far as I can tell) never saw the field.
Erving practiced all week, but he didn’t see the field.Is it possible that Reid basically decided to take kind of a soft “rest the starters” approach to this game with the expectation that we’ll easily beat the Raiders next week?”
Rest Scandrick, and play Mahomes the whole game? Heh, heh… Now isn’t that the silliest thing I’ve ever heard
@brdempsey69 346293 wrote:
That sounds plausible. The team just was flat, as a whole, against Seattle last Sunday & it seems as though they were looking ahead to the season final and playing at home against the Raiders.
Agreed, it did seem as if they were looking ahead to next week after learning of the LAC defeat at Baltimore.
@NJChiefs 346308 wrote:
Rest Scandrick, and play Mahomes the whole game? Heh, heh… Now isn’t that the silliest thing I’ve ever heard
I thought this was strange as well and the only thing I could think of, given the premise, was that Reid didn’t want to appear to be completely “mailing it in”. Of course, all of this is mere conjecture.
It’s been a couple of days but I think this thread needs a bump.
For years I heard that it was Alex Smith holding us back. Well, this years loss was a lot like the ones with Alex. The offense went a LONG stretch without doing anything and it was costly. Alex wasn’t anywhere in sight. A franchise QB having a historic season was there. And in RED. And we put up nothing in the first half. 0.
Yes Sutton needed to go but at the very least the Defense did SOMETHING in the first half. They stopped Brady a few times. It was that side that showed up more ready to play. Sutton as bad as he was did a better job getting guys ready then Reid did. Now Sutton is gone.
This leaves me to ask one thing. If we are back here yet again next year losing a game that we really should have won. Who’s next to be the scapegoat. Alex isn’t walking through that door anymore. And now Sutton isn’t either. I really hope if we are here again next year finally the finger gets pointed at the person it should ANDY REID. On that day I can finally stop ranting about him
@Seek 347942 wrote:
All I have to say is, remember the days when Herm Edwards, Todd Hailey and Romeo Crenel were head coaches. Be careful what you ask for.
I’ve seen this argument a lot. And hey I get it.
But I just don’t think that because things could be worse we shouldn’t try to get better.
It could have been worse the Alex remember Cassel.Palko,Quinn ECT so we shouldn’t have tried to get Mahomes?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.