Should timsatt1 be banned?

This topic has 137 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 11 months ago by .

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 139 total)

← 1 2 3 … 5 6 7 8 9 10 →

Author

Posts
12/19/2007 at 5:32 pm #811636
Chiefster
Participant
luv;57371 wrote:

15 people voted. Where was there room for the majority to be overwhelming? :p

Just a question, though. Was he?

There wasn’t really unless it was like 15-0 or 10-5 or something like that.

…And, not to my knowledge, but I will be happy to discuss the possibility with Coach and the other mods. However, admittedly I have not read all of his replies, but from what I’ve seen he has not actively engaged in rule violations and unfortunately being a nuisance is not one of them.

rbedgood;57375 wrote:

I wasn’t referring to the numbers of the poll, more in the results. Tim’s actually banning had more to do with his consistent behavior than anything we voted on, but it was an opportunity to invoke “The Donald”. :yahoo:

HA! 😆
12/19/2007 at 5:34 pm #811637
Chiefster
Participant
Now it’s 8-8, my projected Chiefs record for this year; unfortunately I was waaaaaaaayyyyy off.
12/19/2007 at 5:36 pm #811638
rbedgood
Chiefster;57382 wrote:

Now it’s 8-8, my projected Chiefs record for this year; unfortunately I was waaaaaaaayyyyy off.

Ahh…but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote…:lol:
12/19/2007 at 5:51 pm #811645
Chiefster
Participant
rbedgood;57383 wrote:

Ahh…but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote…:lol:

I guess it’s a good thing that I haven’t voted then or the majority would probably swing in the other direction.

😆
12/19/2007 at 6:01 pm #811649
luv
I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.
12/19/2007 at 6:11 pm #811650
Chiefster
Participant
luv;57394 wrote:

I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

Yup, chief31 did a fine job temporarily banning him for very good reasons.
12/19/2007 at 6:15 pm #811652
anaeelbackwards
luv;57394 wrote:

I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

yeah i just saw that too.

so does that mean he doesn’t post anymore?! and what about play cards?!

what happened? did he just really go overboard?
12/19/2007 at 6:42 pm #811665
DTFan4life
timsatt1;55138 wrote:

i voted yes just for fun as well, so now i got to figure out who the 3rd person was…that took it seriously !!!

Chiefster;57381 wrote:

There wasn’t really unless it was like 15-0 or 10-5 or something like that.

…And, not to my knowledge, but I will be happy to discuss the possibility with Coach and the other mods. However, admittedly I have not read all of his replies, but from what I’ve seen he has not actively engaged in rule violations and unfortunately being a nuisance is not one of them.

HA! 😆

he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.
12/19/2007 at 6:47 pm #811667
luv
DTFan4life;57412 wrote:

he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.

Hmmmm….
12/19/2007 at 6:49 pm #811668
Chiefster
Participant
luv;57415 wrote:

Hmmmm….

Yes; provocative.
12/19/2007 at 6:56 pm #811669
hermhater
I tried to warn him in PM, but he said he couldn’t be banned because he is a master of proxy servers, and doesn’t have a clue.
12/19/2007 at 6:59 pm #811672
Chiefster
Participant
anaeelbackwards;57397 wrote:

yeah i just saw that too.

so does that mean he doesn’t post anymore?! and what about play cards?!

what happened? did he just really go overboard?

So, it would seem.
12/19/2007 at 9:38 pm #811724
DTFan4life
hermhater;57417 wrote:

I tried to warn him in PM, but he said he couldn’t be banned because he is a master of proxy servers, and doesn’t have a clue.

damn proxy servers. what are those anyways?:funnypost:
12/19/2007 at 11:32 pm #811744
hermhater
DTFan4life;57412 wrote:

he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.

luv;57415 wrote:

Hmmmm….

I second that luv….

Hmmmm…

(sniff)
12/20/2007 at 12:51 am #811755
Guru
rbedgood;57383 wrote:

Ahh…but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote…:lol:

I haven’t voted yet.
Author

Posts