Should timsatt1 be banned?

Home Forums Kansas City Chiefs The Locker Room Should timsatt1 be banned?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 139 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #811636
    Chiefster
    Participant
      Up
      0
      Down
      ::
      luv;57371 wrote:
      15 people voted. Where was there room for the majority to be overwhelming? :p

      Just a question, though. Was he?

      There wasn’t really unless it was like 15-0 or 10-5 or something like that.

      …And, not to my knowledge, but I will be happy to discuss the possibility with Coach and the other mods. However, admittedly I have not read all of his replies, but from what I’ve seen he has not actively engaged in rule violations and unfortunately being a nuisance is not one of them.

      rbedgood;57375 wrote:
      I wasn’t referring to the numbers of the poll, more in the results. Tim’s actually banning had more to do with his consistent behavior than anything we voted on, but it was an opportunity to invoke “The Donald”. :yahoo:

      HA! 😆

      #811637
      Chiefster
      Participant
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::

        Now it’s 8-8, my projected Chiefs record for this year; unfortunately I was waaaaaaaayyyyy off.

        #811638
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::
        Chiefster;57382 wrote:
        Now it’s 8-8, my projected Chiefs record for this year; unfortunately I was waaaaaaaayyyyy off.

        Ahh…but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote…:lol:

        #811645
        Chiefster
        Participant
          Up
          0
          Down
          ::
          rbedgood;57383 wrote:
          Ahh…but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote…:lol:

          I guess it’s a good thing that I haven’t voted then or the majority would probably swing in the other direction.

          😆

          #811649
          luv
            Up
            0
            Down
            ::

            I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

            #811650
            Chiefster
            Participant
              Up
              0
              Down
              ::
              luv;57394 wrote:
              I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

              Yup, chief31 did a fine job temporarily banning him for very good reasons.

              #811652
              Up
              0
              Down
              ::
              luv;57394 wrote:
              I just noticed that it says Banned under his name.

              yeah i just saw that too.

              so does that mean he doesn’t post anymore?! and what about play cards?!

              what happened? did he just really go overboard?

              #811665
              DTFan4life
                Up
                0
                Down
                ::
                timsatt1;55138 wrote:
                i voted yes just for fun as well, so now i got to figure out who the 3rd person was…that took it seriously :(!!!
                Chiefster;57381 wrote:
                There wasn’t really unless it was like 15-0 or 10-5 or something like that.

                …And, not to my knowledge, but I will be happy to discuss the possibility with Coach and the other mods. However, admittedly I have not read all of his replies, but from what I’ve seen he has not actively engaged in rule violations and unfortunately being a nuisance is not one of them.

                HA! 😆

                he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.

                #811667
                luv
                  Up
                  0
                  Down
                  ::
                  DTFan4life;57412 wrote:
                  he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.

                  Hmmmm….

                  #811668
                  Chiefster
                  Participant
                    Up
                    0
                    Down
                    ::
                    luv;57415 wrote:
                    Hmmmm….

                    Yes; provocative.

                    #811669
                    Up
                    0
                    Down
                    ::

                    I tried to warn him in PM, but he said he couldn’t be banned because he is a master of proxy servers, and doesn’t have a clue.

                    #811672
                    Chiefster
                    Participant
                      Up
                      0
                      Down
                      ::
                      anaeelbackwards;57397 wrote:
                      yeah i just saw that too.

                      so does that mean he doesn’t post anymore?! and what about play cards?!

                      what happened? did he just really go overboard?

                      So, it would seem.

                      #811724
                      DTFan4life
                        Up
                        0
                        Down
                        ::
                        hermhater;57417 wrote:
                        I tried to warn him in PM, but he said he couldn’t be banned because he is a master of proxy servers, and doesn’t have a clue.

                        damn proxy servers. what are those anyways?:funnypost:

                        #811744
                        Up
                        0
                        Down
                        ::
                        DTFan4life;57412 wrote:
                        he probably didnt help his own cause in the vote it looks like.
                        luv;57415 wrote:
                        Hmmmm….

                        I second that luv….

                        Hmmmm…

                        (sniff)

                        #811755
                        Up
                        0
                        Down
                        ::
                        rbedgood;57383 wrote:
                        Ahh…but apparently Guru had the tie-breaking vote…:lol:

                        I haven’t voted yet.

                      Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 139 total)
                      • The topic ‘Should timsatt1 be banned?’ is closed to new replies.