I didn’t see anything personal in those statements. Maybe prough91 just needed to put timsatt1 on his ‘ignore’ list.

timsatt1, you can be a very irritating person, on here. But, I remember being in my early twenties, myself. Later, when you look back on yourself, you may be embarrassed for yourself. Maybe not. But I know I was more cocky and judgemental than I feel that I should have been.

But, I do not see any violation of the rules there. I generalize to make my point alot too. And if it isn’t specifically insulting someone, then it isn’t a violation of the rules. At least not in my opinion.

I voted yes on the poll, (Just for fun.) but I will not be banning him….YET.

i cant speak for liberals…just the leaders of the liberal party aka the house and senate leaders and speaker of house.

first off….they believe in freedom of speach? is that why the actual leaders of the liberal agenda tried to stop a private citizen, rush limbaugh, for being able to use his freedom of speach on his private radio station.

second….bringing back the fairness doctrine on the radio waves? yes, this what the democrats in the senate tried to do…make it to where the radio waves are now monitored by government, and there has to be equal time for every side, democrat and republican.

so, there is your liberals and their “freedom of speach” aka “we truly want a socialist or communist country, whichever comes first.”

ok mr HH. you are a nice guy. i like you…

…but how can you just make a general statement without actually debating.

take this post you just now responded to.

first of all, have you been informed yet that Mr. Harry Reed, that would be your senate leader, called Rush Limbaugh’s boss and informed rush limbaughs boss that he was upset with some of the things rush had said.

then the next day he actually spoke out against rush on the senate floor during real government work hours!!! this is government attacking a private citizen for their freedom of speach….so where exactly am i lost on this? this is actually historic what happened. this is the first time ever that the senate attacked a person for their freedom of speech on the senate floor.

and then the second thing i brought up…..the democrats in the senate tried to bring back the fairness doctrine making it to where the government would literally monitor each radio station and make sure that if a republican got 30 seconds to talk about republican issues that a democrat got his turn to share his thoughts.

where at in this am i lost.

ok….why are you bringing up fox? it had nothing to do with tv, only radio.

and you can bring up another time that the senate actually called out a private citizen ON THE SENATE FLOOR for using their freedom of speach.

but please wait till you are sober to respond to this discussion anymore.

everything i said in these last few responses that i posted is fact about the fairness doctrine and also the senate government attacking a private citizen for their free speach.

You know that there are examples of each side of the floor going against the consensus of what their side of the floor generally represents. It is no big miracle.

Not to suppress the campaign of a political contender because of their politics.

The publication has the right to censor content (because of obscenity) but not to disallow advertising from any political party.

I thought you would have known that.

The media is the same as anything else. They have a “left side”, and a “right side”. And most people who are “on the left” don’t consider themselves to be ” on the left”. They are considered to be so, by those who aren’t.

Myself, and most people that I know, I consider myself to be neither, on the left, nor on the right. Because there are issues that I agree with one side, whereas I agree with the other side on other issues.

So, no. I don’t agree with “people are in line with…” statement.