- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Hayvern;148091 wrote:Me too, but I just don’t think even one or two would do it.
Agreed. But just to have the opportunity to ask him a hard question would go a long way. Especially on live TV. I know people don’t like the plumber but he asked the perfect question and Obama gave the absolute worst answer for his cause. Showed his true colors for America IMO. Getting hard questions from the public is a lot different than getting prepared questions in a press conference.
Guru;148098 wrote:Agreed. But just to have the opportunity to ask him a hard question would go a long way. Especially on live TV. I know people don’t like the plumber but he asked the perfect question and Obama gave the absolute worst answer for his cause. Showed his true colors for America IMO. Getting hard questions from the public is a lot different than getting prepared questions in a press conference.yet i don’t believe those live tv questions, like the town halls, because maybe they plant a couple of seeds in the audience and they worked on the questions and answers. If only polititians would stop lieing
Yeah darn funny isn’t it that Obama in New Hampshire just couldn’t happen to find a single challenging question while at the same time all over the country in other town halls the Democrat congress was getting inundated with them!
Obama just wouldn’t dare let people see him on tv where people are upset with him and his big government health care plan that he hasn’t even read himself.
Probably going to be more of the same in Montana. Jusy maybe this time they’ll permit a token concern of a question from someone (like, “Mr. Persident, I’m concerned how much this plan is going to cost”) but even that’s pushing it.
Obama’s “town halls” are really infomercials.
tornadospotter;148160 wrote:You could ask him where he gets his e-mail list, and if the people receiving the e-mails asked to be on the list, or if he is just spamming.
This is one of the few times I will defend Gibbs. Major Garrett was being a complete (donkeys hind end) with that question. That was a waste of everyone’s time.
Guru;148263 wrote:This is one of the few times I will defend Gibbs. Major Garrett was being a complete (donkeys hind end) with that question. That was a waste of everyone’s time.It was a relevant question as what the White House is doing with collecting the names some consider unConstitutional.
Anyway, if they are sending e-mails to people unsolicited they are breaking the anti-spam law they passed back in 2004.
In the grand scheme of things though, this is pretty small potatos compared to where we are headed right now.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.