Home › Forums › Kansas City Chiefs › The Locker Room › Goodell at it again.
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
02/11/2010 at 5:34 pm #741762
honda522
Memberhttp://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/football/nfl/super-bowl/02/07/goodell.ap/index.html?eref=sihp
Can’t say I am too happy about this.
02/11/2010 at 8:14 pm #923537Hayvern
MemberBanning the three point stance? Does it really matter? I think it all depends on if they make it illegal on both sides of the ball. Right now, the rules are so slanted to protecting offense, that it would suck to have a rule where it was even harder for defenders to do their job.
I liken this to the changes in baseball in the late 80s and early 90s, where they juiced the ball and lowered the pitchers mound to help hitters be more productive. The unintended consequence to these changes (along with steroid use at the time) was to create a league where pitchers were killing themselves to try and get guys out.
I don’t particular care about how the players change their stance, as long as it is mandated where it levels the field on both sides of the ball.
02/11/2010 at 9:10 pm #923554imported_AussieChiefsFan
MemberThat’s Crazy!!!!!!!! Haven’t Players Been Doing That For Like 90 Years?!?!?!
02/11/2010 at 9:32 pm #923562matthewschiefs
ParticipantWhy dont they just ban defense and get it over with.
02/11/2010 at 9:58 pm #923564imported_AussieChiefsFan
Membermatthewschiefs;179381 wrote:Why dont they just ban defense and get it over with.………………….
02/11/2010 at 11:10 pm #923567tornadospotter
MemberOMG! Lets just ban football!
02/12/2010 at 12:11 am #923572imported_AussieChiefsFan
Membertornadospotter;179387 wrote:OMG! Lets just ban football!This is getting out of hand.
02/12/2010 at 1:28 am #923580matthewschiefs
Participanttornadospotter;179387 wrote:OMG! Lets just ban football!no they just want to ban defense so they get high scoreing exciting games. They will keep makeing rules to limit what the defense could do.
02/12/2010 at 3:30 am #923593honda522
MemberHayvern;179356 wrote:Banning the three point stance? Does it really matter? I think it all depends on if they make it illegal on both sides of the ball. Right now, the rules are so slanted to protecting offense, that it would suck to have a rule where it was even harder for defenders to do their job.I liken this to the changes in baseball in the late 80s and early 90s, where they juiced the ball and lowered the pitchers mound to help hitters be more productive. The unintended consequence to these changes (along with steroid use at the time) was to create a league where pitchers were killing themselves to try and get guys out.
I don’t particular care about how the players change their stance, as long as it is mandated where it levels the field on both sides of the ball.
Its not doing away with the 3 point stance. Its the principle of Goodell being a B**ch and taking everything the NFL has been built on.
People are renaming it the No fun leauge.
What is going to be next? They can’t intercept the ball?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.