Free Agency

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 77 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1064820
    matthewschiefs
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @Chiefs4life24 341484 wrote:

    The Chiefs are attempting to retain Tyler Bray. My question would be WHY??? he is garbage

    I agree.

    He has an arm but that’s about it. He is just not an NFL QB and has shown no devolvement

    #1064821
    jason1981
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @matthewschiefs 341486 wrote:

    I agree.

    He has an arm but that’s about it. He is just not an NFL QB and has shown no devolvement

    How about instead of complaining you name some qbs that cpukd fix your issue? Dont say chase daniels either. He doesnt habe the arm to run our offense and we will habe to change it to fit him. So whos out there who is similar to mahomes that we wouldnt habe to drastically change our system? Im all ears. I myself lost some hope in bray and not sure i trust him but id rather have bray than daniels. Also remeber nowadays good backups arent cheap anymore either. Would you rather have an unkowm rookie tham bray? Rookie wouldnt know our offense amd doubt he could help advise mahomes on what he seeafrom sidelines. I dont know all the fa qbs so go ahead and name them and then we can discuss whats better.

    #1064822
    Chiefs4life24
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    I would’ve rather had Bridgewater than Bray

    #1064823
    Chiefs4life24
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    CB market is getting thin

    Malcolm Butler has signed with the Titans for 5 years at 61 million

    Trumaine Johnson has signed with the Jets (who I wanted) for 15 Million per year

    #1064824
    Chiefs4life24
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    you know a crazy idea for a vet minimum, sign Cutler and draft another young backup. Hell AJ McCarron is available and he has a good arm, but he wouldn’t be cheap

    #1064825
    Bike
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    Or Cassel

    #1064826
    Chiefs4life24
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    Mohummed Wilkerson has signed with the Packers

    #1064827
    Chiefs4life24
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    Wilkerson deal with Packers is for 1 year 5 million with 3 million in incentives

    #1064828
    jason1981
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @Chiefs4life24 341488 wrote:

    I would’ve rather had Bridgewater than Bray

    He will be wanting a chsnce to start. We need a back up not a guy whos vying to start.

    #1064829
    matthewschiefs
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @jason1981 341487 wrote:

    How about instead of complaining you name some qbs that cpukd fix your issue? Dont say chase daniels either. He doesnt habe the arm to run our offense and we will habe to change it to fit him. So whos out there who is similar to mahomes that we wouldnt habe to drastically change our system? Im all ears. I myself lost some hope in bray and not sure i trust him but id rather have bray than daniels. Also remeber nowadays good backups arent cheap anymore either. Would you rather have an unkowm rookie tham bray? Rookie wouldnt know our offense amd doubt he could help advise mahomes on what he seeafrom sidelines. I dont know all the fa qbs so go ahead and name them and then we can discuss whats better.

    I would still take Daniel over Bray. Arm strength is good in all but it’s not everything and when you see bonehead plays from a guy it doesn’t matter about arm strength. Daniel knows the system he has been in it. He wouldn’t really have to learn a whole lot just some things that have been tweaked in the last couple of years.

    #1064830
    jason1981
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @matthewschiefs 341495 wrote:

    I would still take Daniel over Bray. Arm strength is good in all but it’s not everything and when you see bonehead plays from a guy it doesn’t matter about arm strength. Daniel knows the system he has been in it. He wouldn’t really have to learn a whole lot just some things that have been tweaked in the last couple of years.

    We will have to change our style with Daniel. I think we will have a big difference in our offense nedt year with mahommes. Nore attack node. With daniels we would be more conservative.

    #1064831
    Chiefs4life24
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    I mean Bray is so bad he should pay the Chiefs to be on the team

    #1064832
    matthewschiefs
    Participant
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @jason1981 341496 wrote:

    We will have to change our style with Daniel. I think we will have a big difference in our offense nedt year with mahommes. Nore attack node. With daniels we would be more conservative.

    Reid has always ran a fairly conservative offense this is nothing new. He would probably take less shots downfield with Daniel then Mahomes. But Mahomes won’t just be airing the ball out under Andy Reid. It’s just not what Reid has done

    #1064833
    slc chief
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @matthewschiefs 341498 wrote:

    Reid has always ran a fairly conservative offense this is nothing new. He would probably take less shots downfield with Daniel then Mahomes. But Mahomes won’t just be airing the ball out under Andy Reid. It’s just not what Reid has done

    You don’t bring in players like Watkins and have hill on the other side and not plan to air it out. Make no mistake there will be a lot of deep balls thrown this year. Why do you think alyx is in Washington.

    #1064835
    jason1981
    Member
    Up
    0
    Down
    ::

    @slc chief 341500 wrote:

    You don’t bring in players like Watkins and have hill on the other side and not plan to air it out. Make no mistake there will be a lot of deep balls thrown this year. Why do you think alyx is in Washington.

    Exactly my point. You can tell reid is serious about opening up The offense with bring in watkins. You will have to close it down with daniels. But thank god bears signed daniels.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 77 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.