- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Connie Jo;177489 wrote:Speaking of Brett’s haircut conference…I remember he and his wife did a commericial for a major corporation, and part of the commercial had him getting a new haircut. In the commercial they had him and his wife out & about shopping and doing errands in Green Bay, maybe that’s what you’re referring to Ryfo? Maybe the press conference was related to his doing that major commercial, it being filmed in Green Bay…moreso than his getting a haircut?
I’m not sure really…it was years ago.
I think most of my dislike for him is just having to hear Packers fans rave over him when he was with the Packers. It gets a little annoying. Honestly, after he went to the Vikings I started to like him a little bit (but not much haha).
Ryfo18;177498 wrote:I’m not sure really…it was years ago.I think most of my dislike for him is just having to hear Packers fans rave over him when he was with the Packers. It gets a little annoying. Honestly, after he went to the Vikings I started to like him a little bit (but not much haha).
Oh, I totally understand! I dislike Peyton Manning for the same reasons! Sick of hearing about him! He’s been the media’s Golden Boy since he entered the NFL, even prior to his being worthy…which I still debate his worthiness of being crowned the best in NFL history…as many dub him.
Trent Green went un-recognized during his peak because of media focus on Manning, whose stat’s at the time placed him under Green. My dislike for Peyton intensified as a result. The controversy over the Colt’s letting Edgerrin James go, mostly due to contract negotiations with a huge salary increase going to Peyton…made me dislike Peyton more. James contributed greatly to Peyton’s success, as did Marvin Harrison.
At least the Colt’s were good enough to give James a Super Bowl ring after letting him go prior to the 2006 season & their resulting SB win. That tells me they knew they did him wrong, giving him a SB ring when he wasn’t even on the team that next year.
I read an article the other day by a journalist who stated Peyton was the greatest NFL player in history at “any position”. I was like WTH? Any position? That’s just taking it way over the top for me, hahaha.
HA! I dislike Peyton enough I can really get to rambling on as to why, hahaha.
Canada;177434 wrote:…and I forgot about the play when Favre ended up getting helped off the field after being hit in the knees? That is the “Tom Brady” rule, cant hit a QB and the knees. If thats Tom Terrific or Princess Payton, that is 15 yards and a 1st down. How come not for the Vikings?I’ve felt for a long time that the league outta just put skirts on those two and they can help earn their wage by doubling as cheer leaders during television time outs.
Connie Jo;177489 wrote:Speaking of Brett’s haircut conference…I remember he and his wife did a commericial for a major corporation, and part of the commercial had him getting a new haircut. In the commercial they had him and his wife out & about shopping and doing errands in Green Bay, maybe that’s what you’re referring to Ryfo? Maybe the press conference was related to his doing that major commercial, it being filmed in Green Bay…moreso than his getting a haircut?Well I found this one. Don’t know if it’s what you’re thinking of though.
[ame=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoEGYFzS0jA”%5DYouTube- Brett Favre Mastercard Priceless[/ame]
Canada;177434 wrote:…and I forgot about the play when Favre ended up getting helped off the field after being hit in the knees? That is the “Tom Brady” rule, cant hit a QB and the knees. If thats Tom Terrific or Princess Payton, that is 15 yards and a 1st down. How come not for the Vikings?I think they should just go ahead and let Brady and peyton were the red shirts that say you cant be touched. Its what the NFL wants so why not just be honest and do it.
and why we are at it why not just put the pats and colts in the superbowl every year.
matthewschiefs;177603 wrote:I think they should just go ahead and let Brady and peyton were the red shirts that say you cant be touched. Its what the NFL wants so why not just be honest and do it.and why we are at it why not just put the pats and colts in the superbowl every year.
They have been trying but they areboth AFC teams so they have to rotate now.
That is the one I was thinking about Chiefster!! Thanks! I remembered something about a haircut, lol. I have a girlfriend who lives near Green Bay, and I remember she was talking about it at the time, what a big deal it was that Brett was doing a major commercial, and it was possibly going to be filmed in Green Bay. It was big news for them anyway, haha.
matthewschiefs;177603 wrote:I think they should just go ahead and let Brady and peyton were the red shirts that say you cant be touched. Its what the NFL wants so why not just be honest and do it.and why we are at it why not just put the pats and colts in the superbowl every year.
I speculatively think the NFL is trying, eithically or not…to indiscreetly influence a Colt’s vs Giants Super Bowl. They have to take their time, can’t be obvious about it. Colts & Giants having been to and won recent Super Bowls…it would appear natural now without question, that the two are good enough teams to end up in a Super Bowl together.
My speculation of a Manning vs Manning Super Bowl in the future, began the year Eli was drafted, and controversy began over him being drafted by the Chargers. Neither the NFL nor the Mannings wanted him to go to the AFC. The Manning family spoke publicly as a unity…saying under no circumstances would Eli play for San Diego or the AFC. SD was forced to trade him.
What other legitimate reasons were there?…other than if Eli went to the AFC, there would be no possibility of a Manning vs Manning Super Bowl. I can’t even begin to imagine the millions, or billions…the NFL and Mannings would profit from such a historic Super Bowl…brother vs brother. The endorsements alone would be astronomical…and the NFL collects a percent of all team and player profits.
Connie Jo;177647 wrote:That is the one I was thinking about Chiefster!! Thanks! I remembered something about a haircut, lol. I have a girlfriend who lives near Green Bay, and I remember she was talking about it at the time, what a big deal it was that Brett was doing a major commercial, and it was possibly going to be filmed in Green Bay. It was big news for them anyway, haha.Glad I could be of assistance.
Connie Jo;177651 wrote:I speculatively think the NFL is trying, eithically or not…to indiscreetly influence a Colt’s vs Giants Super Bowl. They have to take their time, can’t be obvious about it. Colts & Giants having been to and won recent Super Bowls…it would appear natural now without question, that the two are good enough teams to end up in a Super Bowl together.My speculation of a Manning vs Manning Super Bowl in the future, began the year Eli was drafted, and controversy began over him being drafted by the Chargers. Neither the NFL nor the Mannings wanted him to go to the AFC. The Manning family spoke publicly as a unity…saying under no circumstances would Eli play for San Diego or the AFC. SD was forced to trade him.
What other legitimate reasons were there?…other than if Eli went to the AFC, there would be no possibility of a Manning vs Manning Super Bowl. I can’t even begin to imagine the millions, or billions…the NFL and Mannings would profit from such a historic Super Bowl…brother vs brother. The endorsements alone would be astronomical…and the NFL collects a percent of all team and player profits.
would not surprise me at all. rstings seem to mean sports leagues throw the rules out the window and do there best to get the matchup that they want in there championship game/series. At least pro wrestling will admit that there outcomes are fixed.
AussieChiefsFan;177378 wrote:Yeah and the first pass of his career was also a pick (for a TD) so if my first and last passes of my career were both picks i wouldn’t feel that good!His last pass as a Packer I might add.
Coach;177455 wrote:I felt bad for Favre. What a crappy way to end your career. I’m sure there lots of Packers fans laughing tho.As a fan also of the Packers I can somewhat understand the anger and disgust with which he ended his career. Sure he did much for the community and the Packers in general but disclosing you did not choose where to play and then desperately trying to go to an arch-rival, well I’m sure some would appreciate many Packer fans feelings. We do not hate him though, it’s much like a brother saying he never truly wanted to be a part of the family in spite of all the good memories.
He is missed by myself and most though… and yes I’m a Chiefs fan first and foremost.
Connie Jo;177651 wrote:I speculatively think the NFL is trying, eithically or not…to indiscreetly influence a Colt’s vs Giants Super Bowl. They have to take their time, can’t be obvious about it. Colts & Giants having been to and won recent Super Bowls…it would appear natural now without question, that the two are good enough teams to end up in a Super Bowl together.My speculation of a Manning vs Manning Super Bowl in the future, began the year Eli was drafted, and controversy began over him being drafted by the Chargers. Neither the NFL nor the Mannings wanted him to go to the AFC. The Manning family spoke publicly as a unity…saying under no circumstances would Eli play for San Diego or the AFC. SD was forced to trade him.
What other legitimate reasons were there?…other than if Eli went to the AFC, there would be no possibility of a Manning vs Manning Super Bowl. I can’t even begin to imagine the millions, or billions…the NFL and Mannings would profit from such a historic Super Bowl…brother vs brother. The endorsements alone would be astronomical…and the NFL collects a percent of all team and player profits.
No doubt. I had similar thoughts and they definitely seem to be coming to NFL dream fruition. Conspiracy eh…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.