Home › Forums › Kansas City Chiefs › KC Chiefs News and Discussion › Bob Sutton – Why is he still here?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
01/16/2018 at 1:24 pm #753696
Bike
Member01/16/2018 at 2:23 pm #1064485ctchiefsfan
Member01/16/2018 at 4:55 pm #106448701/16/2018 at 5:40 pm #1064488ctchiefsfan
Member01/16/2018 at 5:54 pm #1064489Seek
Member::@ctchiefsfan 340966 wrote:
He did pretty well the first 4 years but not so much this year. I’m not so sure if that was Sutton’s fault or injuries and aging players.
Did He? We bent a lot an tried not to break. We had one of the worst run defenses the last three years.
01/16/2018 at 8:18 pm #1064492matthewschiefs
Participant01/16/2018 at 8:30 pm #1064493ctchiefsfan
Member::@Seek 340970 wrote:
Did He? We bent a lot an tried not to break. We had one of the worst run defenses the last three years.
Seems to me the Defense was damned good the first 4 years. Do I remember wrong that they were in the top 8 or better each of those years? And weren’t they always very good at collecting turnovers? Even this year the Chiefs were #2 in takeaway ratio (although that was more because of the offense not giving up the ball than because the defense took it away. In 2016 we were tied for #1 in differential and #1 in takeaways. In 2015 we were #4 in takeaways and #2 in differential.
Of course the turnover differential has a lot to do with Alex not throwing INTs but here are the last 3 years of the Chiefs ranking in takeaways….2017…#6…2016…#1….2015…#4. So our Defense has been very good at generating takeaways.
Now….are those takeaways individual actions, coaching or a combination of both? I don’t pretend to know. But my THEORY is that Sutton combines a “bend but don’t break” attitude with a coaching environment that encourages taking RISKS if a player thinks he sees an opportunity for a takeaway.
But without a doubt we’ve developed a bad case of “can’t defend the run”. Now is that a function of the individual players? Is it a function of being very aggressive at going after the ball? Is it a function of just plain crappy tackling? Again, I don’t pretend to know. But CERTAINLY our Defense needs remedial tackling practice. What I don’t know is whose fault that is….coaching? players?
So I’m not saying Sutton doesn’t need to go nor am I saying he needs to stay. I’m saying that I suspect that none of us really knows what the problem is and that I CERTAINLY DON’T.
My summary….
Our Defense needs A TON OF WORK in the draft and free agency….probably for the next 2-3 years. Tamba is finished. Ford is….well….Ford and that ain’t too much. We simply don’t have a decent OLB on the right side and without that Houston just isn’t the threat he used to be. DJ was great and he’s still damned good, but the two major injuries and age are making him less of a factor as each year goes by. Poe is gone. What used to be our “Stone Wall” has turned to sandstone while we have invested in Offense.
And now we find ourselves with depleted draft picks and crumbling Defense. Sutton’s fault? Not so much in my opinion. We have simply over-invested in Offense and now we need to find a way to put things back in balance.
In the end I still think the future rests on our ability to trade Alex for some good draft picks and Veach’s ability to use them wisely if we get them.
01/16/2018 at 8:57 pm #1064495Bike
Member::@ctchiefsfan 340974 wrote:
Seems to me the Defense was damned good the first 4 years. Do I remember wrong that they were in the top 8 or better each of those years? And weren’t they always very good at collecting turnovers? Even this year the Chiefs were #2 in takeaway ratio (although that was more because of the offense not giving up the ball than because the defense took it away. In 2016 we were tied for #1 in differential and #1 in takeaways. In 2015 we were #4 in takeaways and #2 in differential.
Of course the turnover differential has a lot to do with Alex not throwing INTs but here are the last 3 years of the Chiefs ranking in takeaways….2017…#6…2016…#1….2015…#4. So our Defense has been very good at generating takeaways.
Now….are those takeaways individual actions, coaching or a combination of both? I don’t pretend to know. But my THEORY is that Sutton combines a “bend but don’t break” attitude with a coaching environment that encourages taking RISKS if a player thinks he sees an opportunity for a takeaway.
But without a doubt we’ve developed a bad case of “can’t defend the run”. Now is that a function of the individual players? Is it a function of being very aggressive at going after the ball? Is it a function of just plain crappy tackling? Again, I don’t pretend to know. But CERTAINLY our Defense needs remedial tackling practice. What I don’t know is whose fault that is….coaching? players?
So I’m not saying Sutton doesn’t need to go nor am I saying he needs to stay. I’m saying that I suspect that none of us really knows what the problem is and that I CERTAINLY DON’T.
My summary….
Our Defense needs A TON OF WORK in the draft and free agency….probably for the next 2-3 years. Tamba is finished. Ford is….well….Ford and that ain’t too much. We simply don’t have a decent OLB on the right side and without that Houston just isn’t the threat he used to be. DJ was great and he’s still damned good, but the two major injuries and age are making him less of a factor as each year goes by. Poe is gone. What used to be our “Stone Wall” has turned to sandstone while we have invested in Offense.
And now we find ourselves with depleted draft picks and crumbling Defense. Sutton’s fault? Not so much in my opinion. We have simply over-invested in Offense and now we need to find a way to put things back in balance.
In the end I still think the future rests on our ability to trade Alex for some good draft picks and Veach’s ability to use them wisely if we get them.
Kind of sucky that there’s probably not somebody out there willing to pay Houston the 13 mil we owe him + his 20 mil contract. Good or bad, injured or healthy, we stuck. We need to unleash Houston and allow him to terrorize qbs instead of dropping back in coverage. Otherwise, we’ll never get our money’s worth out of him at this stage in his career.
01/16/2018 at 11:23 pm #1064498ctchiefsfan
Member::@Bike 340976 wrote:
Kind of sucky that there’s probably not somebody out there willing to pay Houston the 13 mil we owe him + his 20 mil contract. Good or bad, injured or healthy, we stuck. We need to unleash Houston and allow him to terrorize qbs instead of dropping back in coverage. Otherwise, we’ll never get our money’s worth out of him at this stage in his career.
You ARE SO RIGHT! And we’re not going to get that unless we get decent pass rush from the right side. Hali used to do it but he can’t anymore and Ford (when he isn’t injured) is no Hali. Houston works from the left (most QBs blind side) and if we get some pressure from the right then the QB is at Houston’s mercy. But if we have no rush from the right then the enemy doubleteams Houston and we have no real pass rush. It’s not all about Houston, it’s about making sure that we have at least some reliable pressure from the right. Get some decent pressure from the right and Houston will eat QBs for breakfast.
01/17/2018 at 12:16 am #1064500Eydugstr
Member::There’s so many holes on the D to fix, so many injuries, I’m not sure where to begin on Sutton. Just going by the rankings alone I’d say let Sutton go, but think we really shot ourselves in the foot when we signed Berry and let Poe go, only to watch Berry get injured at the beginning of the season. We also didn’t do ourselves any favors in the previous offseason by addressing our cornerback situation, and Darrell Revis was a Band-Aid on a bullet hole.
My big concern is that Reid ran a lot of 4-3 defenses when he was in Philly, and if he decides to let Sutton go would want to switch back to a 4-3. With our current roster that would be an even worse disaster, and it would create more holes to plug.
01/17/2018 at 12:20 am #1064502ctchiefsfan
Member::@Eydugstr 340983 wrote:
There’s so many holes on the D to fix, so many injuries, I’m not sure where to begin on Sutton. Just going by the rankings alone I’d say let Sutton go, but think we really shot ourselves in the foot when we signed Berry and let Poe go, only to watch Berry get injured at the beginning of the season. We also didn’t do ourselves any favors in the previous offseason by addressing our cornerback situation, and Darrell Revis was a Band-Aid on a bullet hole.
My big concern is that Reid ran a lot of 4-3 defenses when he was in Philly, and if he decides to let Sutton go would want to switch back to a 4-3. With our current roster that would be an even worse disaster, and it would create more holes to plug.
And as things stand now we don’t have cap or draft picks to plug holes with.
01/17/2018 at 12:42 am #1064506Eydugstr
Member::@ctchiefsfan 340985 wrote:
And as things stand now we don’t have cap or draft picks to plug holes with.
That’s it in a nutshell. Veach better be working some phones on a killer trade deal for Alex Smith.
01/17/2018 at 8:44 am #1064510ctchiefsfan
Member::@Eydugstr 340989 wrote:
That’s it in a nutshell. Veach better be working some phones on a killer trade deal for Alex Smith.
Yeah….we’re caught between a rock and a hard place. Our once great Defense is aging and the ones that are aging are the leaders. Yet at the same time we mortgaged our future to get Mahomes and so as things stand now we don’t have the draft capital to bring in the new AND CHEAP blood our Defense desperately needs. I don’t know if Reid and Dorsey realized it at the time but they made a very dangerous gamble. They bet the Chiefs future on what we could trade Alex for this year. If we can recoup most of what we gave up to get Mahomes by trading Smith and Veach uses the picks we get from the trade well then we are all set for several years. Alternatively, if we can’t trade Alex for some serious draft capital then Mahomes may be in the same situation he was in college….no defense and trying to win a shootout every week. And we know how that went. The implications of the trade to get Mahomes are really starting to sink in for me. I worry that we are going to be forced to turn into “Air Coryell”.
01/17/2018 at 6:42 pm #1064522Bike
Member::@ctchiefsfan 340993 wrote:
Yeah….we’re caught between a rock and a hard place. Our once great Defense is aging and the ones that are aging are the leaders. Yet at the same time we mortgaged our future to get Mahomes and so as things stand now we don’t have the draft capital to bring in the new AND CHEAP blood our Defense desperately needs. I don’t know if Reid and Dorsey realized it at the time but they made a very dangerous gamble. They bet the Chiefs future on what we could trade Alex for this year. If we can recoup most of what we gave up to get Mahomes by trading Smith and Veach uses the picks we get from the trade well then we are all set for several years. Alternatively, if we can’t trade Alex for some serious draft capital then Mahomes may be in the same situation he was in college….no defense and trying to win a shootout every week. And we know how that went. The implications of the trade to get Mahomes are really starting to sink in for me. I worry that we are going to be forced to turn into “Air Coryell”.
All we’re gonna get at most is a second pick for Alex, but probably a third. (I’d like both lol) But I’m just going by what san fran gave for garoppolo. Do you think that one pick will make all the difference if we sink or swim? I guess we could trade it for a couple later round picks, and, of course, it decreases our cap.
Don’t be surprised if Alex stays right here and plays out his contract.01/17/2018 at 7:04 pm #1064523ctchiefsfan
Member::@Bike 341006 wrote:
All we’re gonna get at most is a second pick for Alex, but probably a third. (I’d like both lol) But I’m just going by what san fran gave for garoppolo. Do you think that one pick will make all the difference if we sink or swim? I guess we could trade it for a couple later round picks, and, of course, it decreases our cap.
Don’t be surprised if Alex stays right here and plays out his contract.Y’know Bike I’m not at all against Alex playing out his contract. Not one bit. I’m just being fatalistic and saying I don’t think it will happen. We’re facing a triple-edged sword….no cap space, limited draft picks and a Defense that needs a major overhaul. I don’t see how we fix all 3 problems while still keeping Alex.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.