- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Binney was such a great follower of Muslim, he had porn? This pos who called for a Holy War against Satan? He who called My Country the Great Satan? He who was the leader of a holy war against my nation?
Seems like he was not so holy after all, but I sure it was just planted evidence, after all he was a shinning true believer of his religion? But wait, it was just for research purpose on the evils of his enemy, that must be why. Such a good and holy Muslim he was said to be. But to be fair, news reports do tell us he did become hole filled at the end of his life, so I guess he did become as close to holie as he will ever be.Canada;229647 wrote:If it ever does change it wont be because of guns and bombs. :bananen_smilies046:Well, thing is…they use guns and bombs against those they believe are their enemies. There is no diplomatic reasoning with insane twisted evil minds. These are countries that not only allow the beating of their women, but encourage it as being their religious right. Women are thought of on the same level as an animal. They’re instructed by elders not to beat the women in the face, only on the body, so they don’t make her ugly to look at in the face with scars & other visual traces of beatings. The men are raised to be abusive & cruel to their own women, children, animals. These people aren’t right in the head or heart. They’re evil.
They just don’t use regular bombs either, they use jets as bombs to kill civilians who did nothing to them. Lord only knows what they’ll use next. They may be sick twisted lost evil souls, but they’re brilliant in strategic planning and following through successfully.
The Japanese targeted Pearl Harbor Naval Base in WWII, not civilians. Although I may not agree, I can comprehend an enemy attacking Military targets, but attacking innocent civilian targets, including children, is pure evil without any justification whatsoever. They also use chemical warfare.
You can’t reason with insanity nor evil. I know that from personal experience.
chief31;229650 wrote:Myself, I think we absolutely did the right thing in showing respect to the deceased. There is not a d**n thing to be gained from being disgraceful toward his body, once he has passed. I think we call that kind of behavior “pure evil” when the roles are reversed.For those who find the death of Bin Laden to lack the full amount of closure they seek, there is nothing that can provide it.
What separates Bin Laden from your average serial killer or rapist, for me, is the aspect of war, and a brazen confession to his own guilt.
Those two factors remove me from any “fair trial”, or “due process” mindset.
Also, while I do celebrate the accomplishment of “cutting off the head” of the Al Quaida “snake”, as a great achievement, I really do not take any joy in the actual death of Bin Laden.
But I have zero remorse too.
I agree with all, 100%.
Connie Jo;229706 wrote:The Japanese targeted Pearl Harbor Naval Base in WWII, not civilians. Although I may not agree, I can comprehend an enemy attacking Military targets, but attacking innocent civilian targets, including children, is pure evil without any justification whatsoever. They also use chemical warfare.While I agree that attacking civilians is beyond reprehensible, the enemy they saught was in those buildings.
They refer to us as “capitalist pigs”, and never “democratic pigs”.
They feel that our economic power is their primary enemy. So, by targeting the Trade Center towers, they did hit the defined enemy.
But by “they” I mean directly, Al Quaida.
Just like Christianity has those who would pervert the belief system and do terrible things in it’s name, Islam has a lot of the same things going on.
I do not believe that all Muslims should be generalized so easily. We all see how much the battle with each other, so clearly, they do not all agree on the basic principles of their religion.chief31;229712 wrote:While I agree that attacking civilians is beyond reprehensible, the enemy they saught was in those buildings.They refer to us as “capitalist pigs”, and never “democratic pigs”.
They feel that our economic power is their primary enemy. So, by targeting the Trade Center towers, they did hit the defined enemy.
But by “they” I mean directly, Al Quaida.
Just like Christianity has those who would pervert the belief system and do terrible things in it’s name, Islam has a lot of the same things going on.
I do not believe that all Muslims should be generalized so easily. We all see how much the battle with each other, so clearly, they do not all agree on the basic principles of their religion.
I understand your explanation for why they attacked the Trade Centers, but it was still a civilian target from my perspective by comparison to Pearl Harbor, other previous enemy attacks against the U.S.and as well…the airplanes they used were overall carrying civilian passengers, including children. They had no conscience for how they treated those passengers prior to killing them either, including if I remember correctly, slitting the throat of a stewardess. There simply is no comprehending their evil sadistic cruelty.
I agree, and I don’t generalize “Muslims” at all, rather I categorize the terrioristic and abusive minds who claim to be “Muslims” separately. However, I do believe known terrorist supporting countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, have a population of which the majority are of evil, cruel, twisted, abusive mindsets. I also don’t believe their Muslim religion has anything to do with their insane behavior, rather they use it as an excuse for being habitual mudereous evil minds, just like Hitler was.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.