Aged Threads

[KansasCityChris]

hermhater;142080 wrote:

Why are you bringing my brother into this?

For the same reason your saying something insulting to me over something that you have no say about. That message is for the Mods, that isn’t you.
Yea he could JM but fact is why do we want to argue? Because your friend got a warning? Insults are wrong, I appoligize HH, but I am not being weak in doing so.

[jmlamerson]

KansasCityChris;142089 wrote:

For the same reason your saying something insulting to me over something that you have no say about. That message is for the Mods, that isn’t you.
Yea he could JM but fact is why do we want to argue? Because your friend got a warning? Insults are wrong, I appoligize HH, but I am not being weak in doing so.

I’m unaware of any friends I have on this board. And I hardly insulted you. I just gave the best possible advice I could give about dealing with the likes of you.

[KansasCityChris]

jmlamerson;142090 wrote:

I’m unaware of any friends I have on this board. And I hardly insulted you. I just gave the best possible advice I could give about dealing with the likes of you.

Well, I can see that your going to keep this up until your banned as well. I do believe that Canada is your friend since your reaction to his banning was calling the Mod a b!tch. Consider yourself on ignore yet again by me.I am sure that doesn’t bother you. Also if anyone else feels the same way that JM does, just put me on ignore, my feelings won’t be hurt and you can go on living like I don’t matter to you.

[jmlamerson]

KansasCityChris;142094 wrote:

Well, I can see that your going to keep this up until your banned as well. I do believe that Canada is your friend since your reaction to his banning was calling the Mod a b!tch. Consider yourself on ignore yet again by me.I am sure that doesn’t bother you. Also if anyone else feels the same way that JM does, just put me on ignore, my feelings won’t be hurt and you can go on living like I don’t matter to you.

I call many, many people b!tches. I was unaware rbe-something was a mod. I don’t regret my post. He posted some pretty stupid stuff.

For anyone reading, I disagree with your post. Don’t put KansasCityChris on “ignore.” His insightful comments should be read be all. I mean, he is a genius. Haven’t you read his posts saying such?

[KansasCityChris]

Chiefster;140749 wrote:

😆

Yup, can’t get rid of the classics. :bananen_smilies046:

I did say this once before but it was interupted by some rude and inmature comments by others so I shall repeat it once more in hopes that we can all maintain maturity levels.
How about this then,
When a thread gets so old or it is no longer active for a certain amount of time they get moved into a archive thread? The reason I am bringing this up is a thread that shouldn’t have been on page 1 of a category like The Locker Room was there. I seriously doubt anyone else that is new enough to not know that thread was on the forum 2 years back might not realize it like me and start talking like it is a new thread.Just a thought.

[rbedgood]

KansasCityChris;142103 wrote:

I did say this once before but it was interupted by some rude and inmature comments by others so I shall repeat it once more in hopes that we can all maintain maturity levels.
How about this then,
When a thread gets so old or it is no longer active for a certain amount of time they get moved into a archive thread? The reason I am bringing this up is a thread that shouldn’t have been on page 1 of a category like The Locker Room was there. I seriously doubt anyone else that is new enough to not know that thread was on the forum 2 years back might not realize it like me and start talking like it is a new thread.Just a thought.

KCC.

While I see your point, the issue with your post wasn’t so much that it was on a thread that was 18 months old, but rather that it was one that was a bit insensitive if it hadn’t been such an old thread. I was around to know Luv, and she was a very sweet gal, but a bit emotional. As such she likely would’ve been quite taken aback by your response. She was one that was probably originally posting that thread to express her feelings of sadness/mourning over a lost pet, and your response wasn’t exactly one of consolation.

As for the issue of archiving or deleting threads I personally don’t agree. I could see maybe making the dates of thread posts a bit more obvious, but other than that I don’t think it is a huge issue.

[Chiefster]

rbedgood;142106 wrote:

KCC.

While I see your point, the issue with your post wasn’t so much that it was on a thread that was 18 months old, but rather that it was one that was a bit insensitive if it hadn’t been such an old thread. I was around to know Luv, and she was a very sweet gal, but a bit emotional. As such she likely would’ve been quite taken aback by your response. She was one that was probably originally posting that thread to express her feelings of sadness/mourning over a lost pet, and your response wasn’t exactly one of consolation.

As for the issue of archiving or deleting threads I personally don’t agree. I could see maybe making the dates of thread posts a bit more obvious, but other than that I don’t think it is a huge issue.

Agreed! Perhaps the thread dates could be a bit more conspicuous.

[Author]

Posts