Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
luv;55939 wrote:Hey genius, why are you responding to someone who has you on ignore?
because i am such the genius that i know bronxy cannot resist not knowing what i said, so he truly doesnt have me on ignore…
…plus, Ms. Genius, he DOESNT HAVE YOU ON IGNORE…so now that YOU responded to that message, using my quotes, he can now see what I typed
bryonc;55920 wrote:I voted, but then put Timsatt on ignore his ignorance finally gets to ya. Well as far as banning him, I could care less I just banned him myself, I just hope he doesnt keep others from coming to this wonderful board. I am quite sure he has cost us some members already.lol….
message too short. oh well, all i have to say is lol
IlovetheChiefs;55647 wrote:Say, these last 2 posts reminded me of another great name a baseball player had! But I’ll post it in the appropriate thread.i played little league with a guy named Blake Hurlbutt.
he just finished his last season with the Wichita State Shockers.
Hurlbutt is the weirdest last name i have heard.
hermhater;55183 wrote:Thank God your parents weren’t too lazy or you would have been born poor and addicted to drugs, and premarital sex!Thank God they weren’t lazy so you CAN be!
haha…ok so even though this joke was directed at me….it was pretty funny. and i just got off the phone with chuch norris, and he said it is sometimes ok to laugh at yourself.
Guru;55176 wrote:It is SPEECH not SPEACH.You want to be accepted as intelligent and can’t spell the damn word you feel so strongly about?
yeah i was actually debating which spelling it was and kept changing it…then posted the wrong one. yes i realize there is a spell checker up there…too lazy to check it. you can accept me however you want to!!! :bananen_smilies046:
oh and by the way i have the freedom of speech and the freedom of type and if i want to spell it speach then i have that freedom too!!! until harry reed takes it away from me.
hermhater;55168 wrote:This comment makes me assume you heard about this particular issues on talk radio, and that it was Rush, in particular.If this is the case I assume there was a bias in his reporting, so I cannot comment on the issue at hand.
I will have to research the issue to inform you why you are wrong!
drudge report, rush limbaugh, fox news, then even went to the Clinton News Network, msnbc, NY times…i go through it all…but go ahead and do your research then u can enlighten me tomorrow aka later today.
chief31;55167 wrote:The media is the same as anything else. They have a “left side”, and a “right side”. And most people who are “on the left” don’t consider themselves to be ” on the left”. They are considered to be so, by those who aren’t.Myself, and most people that I know, I consider myself to be neither, on the left, nor on the right. Because there are issues that I agree with one side, whereas I agree with the other side on other issues.
So, no. I don’t agree with “people are in line with…” statement.
ok, ill agree that there are many independends out there that dont agree with mainstream media and some liberals that just arent as far left as the mainstream media.
so…there…i finally agreed with you. you get a lolipop!
hermhater;55165 wrote:Not to suppress the campaign of a political contender because of their politics.The publication has the right to censor content (because of obscenity) but not to disallow advertising from any political party.
I thought you would have known that.
ok i think you are right on this one, i think i have heard that before….it is true that you cannot suppress a political contender…
…but this issue had nothing to do with when the senate brought up the fairness doctrine. they were specifically talking about “talk radio” and the imbalance of it….conservatives dominating the liberals.
chief31;55161 wrote:You know that there are examples of each side of the floor going against the consensus of what their side of the floor generally represents. It is no big miracle.yeah, to a degree there is, but the issues i am talking about is a very big deal…trying to stop a person’s freedom of speach.
the democrats and the media are pretty much on the same page….but are you telling me that the actual people that are to the left are not in line with the media and political leaders? the ones that i know sure are.
hermhater;55157 wrote:That’s where you’re lost for starters.ok….why are you bringing up fox? it had nothing to do with tv, only radio.
and you can bring up another time that the senate actually called out a private citizen ON THE SENATE FLOOR for using their freedom of speach.
but please wait till you are sober to respond to this discussion anymore.
everything i said in these last few responses that i posted is fact about the fairness doctrine and also the senate government attacking a private citizen for their free speach.
