[chief31]

Canada;232077 wrote:

Someone told me they found your site and I wanted to see if it was true that you were a gay porn model!! :pointlaugh:

Ok. Go ahead and pretend like you weren’t aroused.:whipping1:

[chief31]

Canada;232046 wrote:

Probably, I started searching and then got distracted

Every single time you start searching the internet, the gay porn distracts you.

QUIT CLICKING ON THE NAKED MEN!!!!!!
:mooning:

[chief31]

bwilliams;225464 wrote:

You responded to my post, not I to you. You obviously wanted an argument. Don’t blame me for pointing out your lack of knowlegde.

Oh, how exactly did you judge Berry, Edwards, and Cassel? I know you’re a fair-weather fan and all, but remember that every post you’ve made is saved on the server here. Assuming you haven’t erased them in embarassment.

By the way, I did nothing but defend Cassel pre-season. Nor did I say Berry would be anything but a good-to-great FS (although I’d have drafted different). But I don’t expect you to be honest enough to admit that.

And I’m proud of you. It was brave of your to avoid a post pointing out your complete lack of knowledge. How brave of you.

I’ll give you the last word. To give me a real apology. If you’re not going to do that, don’t bother posting.

Ok then. I’ll take it.

All you have done here is to spout off nonsense, and pass it off as fact. Then, when the facts were presented, and you were proven wrong, You just decided to delve deeper into the mud-slinging and hope that you had yelled above the fact that you were flat-out wrong.

I fully expected you to come back here and admit that The Chiefs had proven you wrong. Which they did.

But that is behavior for respectable, intelligent people. You wouldn’t want to be associated with any of that kind of behavior, would you?

Why? That is embarrassing.

You prefer to stick to your poor mistakes and just carry on and tell everyone how right you were, while showing everyone how completely wrong you were.

Now let’s deal with some of the nonsense that I had intended to let you get away with…

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

I’ve been out of the country since late August. I teach abroad every fall (and sometimes in Spring).

Aww. You mean that the world-wide web doesn’t reach you? How is it that you were always lurking here?

Perhaps you are just full of it. You certainly have proven that capability.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

First you send me emails all new year’s eve asking me to come back here. Next, you’re objecting to every post you can find. Make up your mind.

Whoa, Fella! I sent you one PM on this site, because I had seen you lurking all season long. And it wasn’t even on that day. I just wanted to invite you back, to take your lumps for your terrible misjudgment of the team, and to enjoy a great turnaround by The Chiefs.

But it seems like you lack something that men have, which compels them to swallowing their pride when they realize an error.

What was I thinking?

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

You might want to lern how to spell “Belichick.”

It’s “learn“. “Learn how to spell…”

But, since civilized people learn from their mistakes, I wouldn’t expect you to have learned how to spell. Just how to wet yourself in a tantrum, on a public forum.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

Neither Belichick nor Cowher is a terrific reglar season coach.

Of course. The guy who coached his team to the best regular season record of all time, and has not managed a record less than the best in his division for ten straight seasons, certainly wouldn’t qualify as a great regular season HC.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

Oh, the rumors about the Steelers replacing Cowher pre-2005 all came from me. I didn’t realize I was that important.

You are that important to you.

And, seeing as how you are the only one who knows of those rumors, common sense (No time to walk you through the meaning, but someone should.) would dictate that you were the one starting those rumors, and spreading them to yourself.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

The Hunts obviously believed Herm Edwards was a very good HC. Were they right?

Yeah.
I don’t remember his fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, nor fifteenth seasons as The Chiefs HC.

How did he do?

Oh. He didn’t get brought back past a third season? That’s my point. Were you conceding then?

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

Great. What are you talking about this time?

It was obvious, the whole way, that you had no clue what was going on.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

Three, yes, a coach shouldn’t be employed for sixteen years without a SB trip. Who disagrees with this?

I do agree. But does it matter that Cowher made a trip to The Super Bowl in his fourth season?

Nah. That’s a fact. And you have proven that facts have nothing to do with anything that you say.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

The question is whether Cowher would be considered anything by average if it weren’t for his 2005 run.

Do you know what the meaning of ‘average’ is? Or do you need to speak to your bookie for some odds, lines and spreads, now the actual facts have gone against you?

The average tenure of an NFL coach is 4.3 years. Executives beat NFL coaches in longevity — barely | Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal

Pretty difficult to have only 4.3 years a an average HC, if you go to the playoffs for all four of them, and make it to a Super Bowl.

That is far beyond average.

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

if Andy Reid or Borv Turner pulls together a SB in 2011, would you consider their tenures a decade of dominance? Quit ducking the question.

Didn’t Cowher make it to two Super Bowls?

Oh damn. My bad. I used a fact again. Sorry. I just can’t get my head so far up my anus to see things as you do, without the facts.

bwilliams;225464 wrote:

By the way, I did nothing but defend Cassel pre-season. Nor did I say Berry would be anything but a good-to-great FS (although I’d have drafted different). But I don’t expect you to be honest enough to admit that.

What did you say of him as a SS?

Same old, same old. Inability to acknowledge your own errors.

As for Cassel? I just threw a couple of names out there. Didn’t want to bother wasting all night searching for the specifics.

Sorry. I hoped that you would be honest enough to volunteer a couple of names, as it is extremely well-known, that you were as down on this team as anyone, prior to this season.

My favorite though…

chief31;225456 wrote:

OK…

There are sixteen teams that make the playoffs. Of those, one will win The Super Bowl. That makes the average 6.25%.

So, by your beloved mathematics, that means sixteen trips to the playoffs should get a Super Bowl victory.

Cowher did it in only ten trips. An average of 10%.

Average – 6.25%
Cowher – 10%

Also, since two teams make it to The Super Bowl, that means it is a one, in eight, chance (12.5%)of reaching The Super Bowl.

Cowher made it twice (Should take sixteen years) in only ten playoff appearances. (20%)

Average – 12.5%
Cowher – 20%

He nearly doubled both of those base percentages.

Now, considering that all of the words that you have used to describe Cower as a playoff coach would mean “less than average”, and his actual performances have been far above average, this makes you wrong, as a matter of fact.

Whoa!!!!

That is some pretty damning evidence!!!!

Look at those hard facts, would ya?

Oh. Wait. Facts? A proven point? That can’t possibly be you. You deal in bulls*** and fit-throwing, not facts and reality.

Aha. That one wasn’t you at all. That was me, destroying your failed logic.

Get used to it.

[chief31]

bwilliams;225459 wrote:

One, we’re not flipping coins. There isn’t a 10% (6.25%)chance of winning a SB. You might want to discover the world of probability, lines, spreads, and odds. Or, you know, talent.

Simple mathematics. No coin toss. No bookies. Just like you asked for.

Look… I am thrilled to have you back here. You bring terrific discussion.

I simply expect a man to recognize, and admit, a mistake. I had to do it with so many of The Chiefs’ players that I underestimated.

And I apologize for getting into the mud-slinging with ya.

But, when you are so quick to make comments like “Do you want some cheese with that whine?”, you can expect some backlash.

Maybe my saying “This is pure horses***” didn’t come off as jovial as it was intended, and I apologize for that too.

As for the regular season numbers, here is The Steelers’ division,(North/Central) from ’97 to ’06, minus the division leader, instead of just subtracting The Steelers.

261-346-1, 42.9%

That is still 0.5% above the average for all division (minus division winners) for the past nine seasons. Which was 42.4%.

Even during the first five seasons, where I did not contest that the division was sub-par, the rest of the division still managed 109-163, 40.1%. Still not quite pathetic.

I just think that, much like Berry, Edwards, and Cassel, you misjudged Cowher, and continued to hold a bias, instead of just biting the bullet, and admitting to the misjudgment.

I’ll leave it at that. You can have the last word.

[chief31]

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

Or . . . just be correct. I know, it seems like a tall order. But re-take some high school math and you’ll get there.

And as an aside, you seem to be much unhappier now than when I was last here. Did you dog die or something? Or are you only happy when the Chiefs are failing?

Unhappy? Boy do you have the jokes and wisecracks.

Perhaps I seem unhappy to you, because I didn’t hold onto the “The Chiefs suck” mentallity that you did, putting me on the opposite side of discussions from you.

Ya see, instead of being afraid to show my face after the team made a fool of me, I stayed, had my share of crow, and enjoyed a very impressive season of Chiefs football.

I didn’t just hide away for the entire season, until the team lost in the playoffs, to come and start downing them again.

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

And if Belichick were as poor as Cowher in the postseason, people woudn’t be calling him one of the greatest coaches ever.

And if the Pats were only being judged on their regular seasons from 2000-present, no one would consider Belichick a top-10 all-time HC.

I know this is your way of trying to excuse the fact that the Steelers basically got 4-6 extremely easy division wins a year against the likes of the the Browns, Bengals, and Jags for Cowher’s entire tenure. Unfortunatle,y numbers don’t lie.

So Bill Bellichick is a poor HC in the regular season, because the division he has been in, taking away his team’s success, had a 47.4% winning percentage? Is that right? Just as you suggest that Cowher was a poor regular season HC because his division managed just a 47.0 winning percentage, when subtracting the best team in it?

Let me get back to you on this one…

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

Yes, until 2005, Cowher was a bad playoffs coach. And if 2005 hadn’t happened, he’d go on the Andy Reid/Marty Schottehemier list of good regular season/bad playoff coaches. One good year has retroactively made everyone pretend Cowher was great all along.

8-9 in the playoffs is far from bad.

About this whole Ricky Bobby mentality that you seem to have going on…

You do realize that “If you’re not first, you’re last” was a joke, right?

No. Really. Not being a wise-guy, it actually was a joke.

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

If he hadn’t done better in his first five years than the next five years, you might have an argument. But he did do better, so you don’t.

First five seasons in the playoffs, 4-5.

Next five, 8-4.

What math class was that?

I know. I know.

You are quick to point out that his team didn’t make the playoffs for three years. Clearly the mark of a terrible HC. 😆

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

Until 2005, no one thought so. Everyone thought he was an underachiever.

Everyone on this board seems to lack long-term memory.

No they didn’t. It was just you.

You just don’t get a fifteenth season to prove anything, if people don’t believe you are a very good HC.

It just doesn’t happen.

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

It’s an oldie, but goodie, whenever someone is whining. Like you were.

Ooo. Yet more quick wit, from the intellectual.

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

Going 9-10 in the playoffs over fourteen years is not enormous success.

Andy Reid is currently 10-9 over twelve years. If he wins the SB next year, are we all going to start pretending he’s had a decade of dominance?

To reverse your quote, you’re only posting the positives, not the negatives.

What positives? A terrible HC has no positives.

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

Off the top of my head, Norv Turner (SD) and Mike Martz (Rams) inherited a much better situation than Tomlin did.

Better? I’ll disagree. Equal? I’m with ya.

bwilliams;225386 wrote:

It isn’t just how much they lost. It’s that they continually lost as favorites.

Or, maybe it’s because I can actually make and retain memories, and I haven’t forgotten Cowher’s records and reputations before 2005.

Wow. More “big boy talk”? Who would have thought it?

bwilliams;225395 wrote:

My point, just in case it’s being missed, is that Cowher’s current reputation is entirely dependent on 2005. That people have forgiven him almost a decade and a half of futitility and playoff chokes based on one fluky SB run. That unless you’re willing to give him fifteen years and unlimited suport, you’re not going to win much with him.

More of that “advanced” math, eh? Two Super Bowl runs, is not equal to one Super Bowl run.

Cowher’s reputation is based, partly, not solely, on 2005. And it supported by over a decade of dominance.

Taking your team to the playoffs 9, out of thirteen, years is far from “futility”.

bwilliams;225401 wrote:

It *was* his decision to go with guys like O’Donnell, Maddox, and Stewart. He (like the Chiefs unfortunately) didn’t see the value of grooming a young franchise QB He had to be talked into drafting Big Ben. Now, he helped turn Ben into what he is (on the field, anyway) today, no doubt, but he kept trying to win wihtout a top-notch QB.

And he kept winning that way.

Doesn’t it seem like it should be even more impressive that he did all that winning without a “top-notch” QB?

OK…

There are sixteen teams that make the playoffs. Of those, one will win The Super Bowl. That makes the average 6.25%.

So, by your beloved mathematics, that means sixteen trips to the playoffs should get a Super Bowl victory.

Cowher did it in only ten trips. An average of 10%.

Average – 6.25%
Cowher – 10%

Also, since two teams make it to The Super Bowl, that means it is a one, in eight, chance (12.5%)of reaching The Super Bowl.

Cowher made it twice (Should take sixteen years) in only ten playoff appearances. (20%)

Average – 12.5%
Cowher – 20%

He nearly doubled both of those base percentages.

Now, considering that all of the words that you have used to describe Cower as a playoff coach would mean “less than average”, and his actual performances have been far above average, this makes you wrong, as a matter of fact.

Now, back to the notion that his division was so weak, you brought the number 47.0% for the division’s record, when subtracting the best team…

Well, I decided to run some numbers for ya…

You tell me, of these divisions, minus their best team, over the past nine seasons (Since the last re-alignment) is the strong division….

AFC
North – 186-246, 43.1%
East – 195-237, 45.1%
South – 191-241, 44.2%
West – 176-256, 40.7%

NFC
North – 167-265, 38.7%
East – 204-227-1, 47.2%
South – 195-237, 45.1%
West – 152-280, 35.2%

Overall league average, minus each division’s winner, for those nine seasons – 1466-1990, 42.4%

You’re numbers for The Steelers, from ’97-’06, came to 47.0%.

Where does that rank in the list above? It’s second best, and only 0.2% away from first, isn’t it?

And, where does it rank against the overall average? Is it 4.6% better than average?

It is, isn’t it?

Where ya gonna back-peddle to now?

[chief31]

Bike;225364 wrote:

Do you really have to keep typing in that wierd font? It gives me a headache after two sentences.

Stop reading after one.

[chief31]

bwilliams;225344 wrote:

That’s certainly your opinion. Unfortunately, it’s a bad one.

Really? Minus Pittsburgh (ya know, the team feasting on the weak division):

1997 – 32-31-1
1998 – 28-36
1999 – 41-39
2000 – 39-41
2001 – 36-44
2002 – 18-30
2003 – 23-25
2004 – 21-27
2005 – 23-25
2006 – 25-23

That’s 286-321-1. Or a 47.0% division.

So . . . you wanna rethink your math there?

Yeah. Let me rethink the math with a total disregard for logic, like you.

How about Bellichick? Nobody has an issue with his success, do they?

If we eliminate the records of the most successful team in the division, how does that division look?

2010 – 22-26
2009 – 22-26
2008 – 27-21
2007 – 22-26
2006 – 23-25
2005 – 18-30
2004 – 23-25
2003 – 22-26
2002 – 26-22
2001 – 30-33

235-260 or a 47.4% division.

WOW!!! That’s absolutely amazing!!!!! The same percentage, when you take away the best team in the division?

Who would have thought that you could remove the most successful portion of a group, and see that the rest of the group is less successful?

Mind-boggling, I know.

But, does it help The AFC North/Central to include that the numbers look even worse because of the fact that they had two expansion teams in there?

So glad I decided to to rethink that. Because it does make it seem like The Steelers were in a tougher division that what he Patriots have been in for the past ten years.

bwilliams;225344 wrote:

1992 – Cowher starts 0-1 in the playoffs, despite being the no. 1 seed
1993 – Cowher loses in the Wild Card round, is now 0-2
1994 – Cowher is upset by San Diego in the AFC Championship, is now 1-3
1995 – Pittsburgh beats the 10-6 Bills and 9-7 Colts to advance to the SB. Where he loses. Cowher is 3-4.
1996 – Cowher beats the 9-7 Colts in the 1st round, but gets killed by the Pats in the 2nd, Cowher is 4-5
1997 – Cowher beats NE 7-6, and then loses to Denver in the AFC Championship, Cowher is 5-6
1998 – Pittsburgh misses playoffs
1999 – Pittsburgh misses playoffs
2000 – Pittsburgh misses playoffs
2001 – Pittsburgh gets No. 1 seed, beats the 10-6 Ravens in the divisional round and loses to NE in the championship, Cowher is 6-7
2002 – Pittsburgh beats the 9-7 Browns in the wild card game, then loses to Tennessee in the next round, Cowher is 7-8
2003 – Pittsburgh misses playoffs
2004 – Pittsburgh beats the 10-6 Jets in the st round, loses to NE in the Championship, Cowher is 8-9
2005 – Pittsburgh wins the SB. Cowher jumps to 12-9.
2006 – Pittsburgh misses playoffs

Hey, you see how it’s only 2005 makiong his record respectable?

Nope.

So he was 8-9 in the playoffs, if you ignore his best achievement?

You don’t want to credit his earlier playoff short-comings to a new HC learning? You’d rather just hold everyone to the highest possible standard?

Meh. Go ahead. He still did pretty damn good.

bwilliams;225344 wrote:

Except for 2005, Pittsburgh never beat anyone but those teams they were expected to beat. Many of the games they lost they lost as the favorites. It’s called “choking.” Cowher was an expert at it.

Do you want some cheese with that whine?

Cheese? Whine?

Ooooo. Good one.

All the while, you are just reaching for every straw that you can, to try and discredit enormous success.

bwilliams;225344 wrote:

Yeah, taking over an 8-8 team with a QB who suffered brain damage in a motorcycle accident was a terrific situation. And do you have an idea how many starters of that 2006 season are starting in the playoff game today?

Acquiring a team that has dominated their division for fifteen years, just a year removed from a Super Bowl victory, with a track record of producing great players, to replace great players, and a DC that has learned to run the league’s best defense from the previous HC staying on board isn’t a great situation to start with?

Maybe you’d like to explain what is a better situation to start out a HC career?

I like Tomlin. But sustaining an existing success would be a whole lot easier than starting from scratch.

bwilliams;225344 wrote:

Bill Cowher is like Marty Schottenheimer, if Marty had an improbably run to the SB his final season. No more.

No more? The 8 wins to that 8-9, prior to his Super Bowl Victory season (So as to discredit him) is like Marty?

That’s just plain wrong. 5-13 is not equal to 8-9.

The fact is that you are trying to suggest that he isn’t that good, by pulling out his best achievements and saying that he didn’t have much success.

I have to think that it’s the chin, itself, that bothers you about Cowher. Because fifteen years of dominance doesn’t really lend itself to much criticism.

[chief31]

bwilliams;225335 wrote:

Look, I’m not Haley’s biggest fan. But bringing in Cowher would be a terrible idea.

I know the media sucked up to Cowher for a decade and a half, but he was not a strong game coach. He coached in the worst division in FB (AFC Central – some mixture of Bengals, Browns, Ravens, Jags, and Titans/Oilers) and ran up winning regular season records. But he was a miserable playoffs coach, only winning a SB in that miserable, horribly officiated Seahawks/Steelers SB. Mike Tomlin has done more in Pittsburgh in his four years than Cowher did in his whole tenure.

Pure horse s***!

With the exception of the first few seasons, Cower was 96-63-1 from ’97 through ’06. And, in that time, The AFC Central/North was a better than .500 division.

And that is allowing you to neglect his first five seasons, where the division was weaker. Over those five seasons, the new HC had a record of 53-27, with four divisional championships.

Now…

How about that playoff record of 12-9?

12-9 is a “miserable” playoff record?

Making it to two Super Bowls, winning one, (The other game may have been bought) is “miserable”?

This has to be a joke.

And Mike Tomlin, while he has done a fantastic job of sustaining the success that Cower brought, was clearly the luckiest man in The NFL when he took over as The Steelers’ HC. What a perfect situation to start with.

But, four years of excellence is, in no way, comparable to taking a losing franchise and turning it into a fifteen year domination machine.

[chief31]

I have been all about the idea of bringing Cowher here since he retired from The Steelers. I think he is a top-notch HC.

However, Todd Haley is The Chiefs’ HC. And he has done an amazing job through two seasons.

If I were given the opportunity to choose, right now, I couldn’t possibly put this team through the changes that would occur with a HC change.

I wouldn’t hire Bill Bellichick in place of Todd Haley this offseason.

Todd Haley is our guy. And he now has to prove to me that he isn’t a great HC, for me to want him out.

[chief31]

85_skill;220425 wrote:

I see it that the Titans win by 11.

No. Really?

You see it as the team you dislike losing handily, despite the very favorable conditions?

Who would have ever thought it?

Yaknow, some folks actually use their minds to make predictions, instead of their hearts.

A Chargers fan seeing things through goggles of hope, instead of using their minds?

What a surprise.

But, if you continue to do nothing but troll, you will not be welcome here much longer.

As a visitor to another team’s site, the burden of respect weighs far more on you, than the residents of the site.

[chief31]

macdaddy123;212472 wrote:

Castle will be the take down of the team, we should have spent the 62 million on the front line and kept Tyler Thigpin, at least he put points on the board. I have been a long time fan, but Castle just needs to go!

Clearly, Cassel was horrible. 469 yards passing, 4 TDs, zero INTs, is the main reason we lost in Denver today.

Wait a second….

…if his current numbers were averaged out over 16 games, he would have 3,344 yards, 59.2 Comp. %, 32 TDs and 8 INTs.

Yeah. Thigpen put points up. He threw for 18 TDs and 12 INTs for us in ’08. (11 starts)

I like Thigpen. I root for him when I see him.

But Cassel is doing much better than Thigpen did.

The defense was the problem today.

Cassel was very good.

[chief31]

#58ChiefsFan;209184 wrote:

honda522;168953 wrote:

I still feel he should be given a full 2 years, we go changing coaches every year, it can be hard on a team. I think Pioli should lock down on his power, force him into a relationship with an OC and fire this terrible DC we have who never should of been fired.

You are joking right?

That was a quote from last season.

The DC Honda wanted fired was no Romeo Crennel.

[chief31]

AussieChiefsFan;188978 wrote:

I’m pretty sure he will! As everyone knows, I’ve been really liking berry for months now and I’m ecstatic that he was drafted 5th overall! In that time I’ve watched countless highlight reels of him ‘making plays’ and for me right now, it’s hard to imagine him NOT making big plays.

I don’t take much from a highlight reel, as it is “highlights”. Obviously, highlights are gonna include your best plays, and none of your worst.

And I am sure people are gonna hate this, but there are a couple of lowlights on youtube.

Here is Eric Berry getting trucked by a QB, Tim Tebow.

[ame=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv3UpcZRlWU&feature=related”%5DYouTube- Eric Berry Vs Tim Tebow[/ame]

And here he is looking like what we are used to seeing from a Chiefs Safety, of late…

[ame=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3UVnudTSYA&feature=related”%5DYouTube- Eric Berry gets juked out of his shoes by Cory Boyd[/ame]

And, just to keep you all happy, here is Berry getting a bit of revenge on Tebow…

[ame=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zfseYeGx9Q&feature=related”%5DYouTube- Eric Berry sacks Tim Tebow[/ame]

[chief31]

Ryfo18;189018 wrote:

In the past, no I am not. Waiting to see what the Chiefs have to bring in 2010.

Well, it’s the same people gonna be in the positions to effect that, so I have alot of concerns about it.

[chief31]

josh1971;188969 wrote:

Oh for the love of….

We’re not even through the draft, and the panic has already begun……

The draft is, for all intensive purposes, over. Only long-shots and projects left.

josh1971;188989 wrote:

Here’s a smattering of the stuff we’ve done since the season ended:

Defensive Line- Shaun Smith , NT

Not much to pin your hopes on there. But I certainly wish for him to become a beast this season.

Offensive Line- Ryan Lijia, G (FA) (Listed on NFL.com as a Center)

Plenty to worry about with this guy.

Casey Wiegman, C (FA)

Love the guy for his years with the Vermiel CHiefs. But he sucked once Vermiel, Roaf, Priest, Green and T-Rich were gone. Not to mention his age at this point.

Jon Asamoah, G (Draft)

Good pick… at the end of the third round.

WR- Jerheme Urban, (FA)

6 career starts in six seasons? Excited would be an overstatement. Actually my saying that is quite the understatement.

Chris Chambers (Re-Signed)

I like him. But is he an improvement over Chris Chambers?

RB (A back to pound between tackles)- Thomas Jones

I like him.

Dexter McCluster (Return Man?)

Cool.

Safety- Eric Berry

Great guy. Glad to have him.

Corner- Javier Arenas (Also a possible return man)

We need as many as we can get. Right?

TE- Tony Moeaki (Hey, didn’t it work out really well last time we had a TE named Tony?)

Meh. Got nothing against him.

Plus, a lot of the guys of our own that we re-signed during free agency are going to be a big help, including Copper, Cox, DJ, Mays, and Studebaker.

So, more of the same from 4-12 last year?

So, we’re not addressing any needs or anything this off season? I mean, we’re just already quitting and calling it a rebuilding year? Nonsense, they have been making moves to improve the team all through this off season, most notably:

Romeo Crennell and Charlie Weiss.

Sorry, Bike. I’m not seeing where we need to be disappointed already.

JB

It isn’t about the players we have brought in. It’s about those that we didn’t. More about the positions that we need to fix and haven’t.

Saying that we haven’t done anything special to improve on our 31st ranked run defense, our 31st ranked pass-rush, and our26th ranked pass-protection is not the same as saying “So, we’re not addressing any needs or anything this off season?“

It’s saying that we have not really addressed the biggest problems that this team had last season. With the exception of coordinators.

Ryfo18;188996 wrote:

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :rocknroll::rocknroll:

Classy.

So, the rest of you are cool with a terrible run-D, pass-rush and pass-protection?

[Author]

Posts